SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 263

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Rajendra Prasad Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Lko – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Saima Khan, Zainul Abbas

JUDGMENT :

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

1. Heard Ms. Saima Khan, learned counsel for the review applicant and Sri Rahul Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel alongwith Sri Alok Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. representing the respondents no. 1, 2 & 3.

2. By means of instant application, the applicant is seeking review of a judgment and order dated 07.01.2026 passed by this Court dismissing Writ- C No. 41 of 2026, which was filed by the review applicant/petitioner challenging the validity of an order dated 21.05.2019 passed by the Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar canceling the fair price shop license of the petitioner, which order had been affirmed by means of an order dated 08.12.2025 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya in appeal filed by the petitioner under Para 13(3) of U.P. Essential Commodities(Regulation of Sale and Distribution) Order, 2016.

3. The learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the writ petition had been filed through Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate and the aforesaid counsel had advances submissions in support of the writ petition. The review application has bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top