SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 274

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 
C/M St. Johns Girls Junior High School - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Another - Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 10958 of 2018
Decided On : 03-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: A.d. Saunders
For the Respondent: Ashish Kumar (nagvanshi), Ajay Kumar Mishra, C.S.C.

Failure to communicate a decision within the prescribed period leads to deemed approval of appointment, despite procedural lapses.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Ministerial Staff and Group D Employees) Rules, 1984 - Rule 13(1), Rule 14, Rule 15(5) - Challenge to disapproval of clerk appointment by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari - Selection of Clerk deemed approved after the statutory period due to the failure of communication. (Paras 65-66).

(B) Administrative law - Procedural compliance - Delay in submission of selection documents due to floods does not invalidate the selection. (Paras 58-60).

(C) Legal standing - Objections raised after extensive proceedings are untimely and lack merit. (Paras 79-82).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner questioned an order disapproving the appointment of Vikas Alexander as Clerk, alleging deemed approval due to lack of timely communication from the Basic Shiksha Adhikari. The selection process was claimed to comply with the statutory requirements despite procedural delays attributed to floods.

Findings of Court:
The court found that deemed approval established validity of Vikas Alexander's appointment despite procedural lapses and ruled the impugned order arbitrary.

Issues: The main questions were the validity of the selection process in light of procedural non-compliance and the impact of communication delays.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that deemed approval applies when the Basic Shiksha Adhikari fails to communicate approval or disapproval within the mandated period and that procedural irregularities do not invalidate a selection that followed legally required steps.

Result: Writ petition allowed and the impugned order quashed, reinstating the appointment.

Table of Content
1. challenge to appointment order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. delay in submitting papers due to floods. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
3. claim of deemed approval under rule 1984. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. impugned order's timing impacts validity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. selection committee's validity despite irregularities. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
6. effect of untimely nomination on process. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
7. respondents' objections to selection process. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
8. sustainability of impugned order examined. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
9. advertisement requirements for clerk position. (Para 41 , 44 , 46 , 49)
10. conformity with recruitment rules assessed. (Para 42 , 43 , 45)
11. technicalities vs. substantive compliance. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
12. grounds for disapproving selection order discussed. (Para 55 , 56 , 57)
13. delay in submission justified. (Para 60 , 61 , 62)
14. deemed approval recognized if timely. (Para 63 , 64 , 65)
15. validity of nominee participation clarified. (Para 66 , 67 , 68)
16. procedural irregularities addressed. (Para 69 , 70 , 71)
17. importance of proper request logged. (Para 72 , 73 , 74)
18. locus standi and maintainability discussed. (Para 75 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
19. impugned order declared unsustainable. (Para 83)
20. order set aside and petition allowed. (Para 84 , 85 , 86 , 87)

JUDGMENT :

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. D. Saunders, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents as well as perused the records.

2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.09.2017 passed by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, disapproving the appointment on the post of Clerk and a further prayer to direct the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari to pass necessary orders for the payment of salary to the selected candidate.

3. Placing the brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Committee of Management of St. John’s Girls Junior High School, which is a recognized, aided, and minority institution (hereinafter referred to as 'the institution'). Several vacancies, including one for the post of Clerk, existed in the said institution. The selection for the post of Clerk in the institution is governed by the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Ministerial Staff and Group D Employees) Rules, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1984').

4. In order to advertise the vacant posts, including that of Clerk, the Manager of the institution sought permission from the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari for advertising the posts. The District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, by letter dated 23.06.2016, granted permission to advertise all the posts, including the post of Clerk. Pursuant to this, the Manager of the institution advertised the posts, including the post of Clerk, in two newspapers: Swatantra Jantmitra and Swatantra Bharat, dated 26.07.2016.

5. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, a large number of applications were received and accordingly, interview letters dated 09.05.2017 were issued to all eligible candidates, fixing 25.05.2017 as the date for the interview before the selection committee.

6. As per Rule 14 of the Rules of 1984, the selection committee was required to be constituted in such a manner that one member would be nominated by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur. Accordingly, by letter dated 09.05.2017, the Manager requested the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, to nominate one representative for constituting the selection committee, which was scheduled on 25.05.2017. In response, the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari nominated and sent Shri Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Principal of Rajkiya High School Barigaon, Belghat, Gorakhpur, as the expert for the selection committee.

7. On 25.05.2017, the select

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top