HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
C/M St. Johns Girls Junior High School - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Another - Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 10958 of 2018
Decided On : 03-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to appointment order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay in submitting papers due to floods. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. claim of deemed approval under rule 1984. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. impugned order's timing impacts validity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. selection committee's validity despite irregularities. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. effect of untimely nomination on process. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. respondents' objections to selection process. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. sustainability of impugned order examined. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. advertisement requirements for clerk position. (Para 41 , 44 , 46 , 49) |
| 10. conformity with recruitment rules assessed. (Para 42 , 43 , 45) |
| 11. technicalities vs. substantive compliance. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 12. grounds for disapproving selection order discussed. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 13. delay in submission justified. (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 14. deemed approval recognized if timely. (Para 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 15. validity of nominee participation clarified. (Para 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 16. procedural irregularities addressed. (Para 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 17. importance of proper request logged. (Para 72 , 73 , 74) |
| 18. locus standi and maintainability discussed. (Para 75 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 19. impugned order declared unsustainable. (Para 83) |
| 20. order set aside and petition allowed. (Para 84 , 85 , 86 , 87) |
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. A. D. Saunders, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ashish Kumar (Nagvanshi), learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents as well as perused the records.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 28.09.2017 passed by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, disapproving the appointment on the post of Clerk and a further prayer to direct the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari to pass necessary orders for the payment of salary to the selected candidate.
3. Placing the brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the Committee of Management of St. John’s Girls Junior High School, which is a recognized, aided, and minority institution (hereinafter referred to as 'the institution'). Several vacancies, including one for the post of Clerk, existed in the said institution. The selection for the post of Clerk in the institution is governed by the Uttar Pradesh Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Ministerial Staff and Group D Employees) Rules, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1984').
4. In order to advertise the vacant posts, including that of Clerk, the Manager of the institution sought permission from the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari for advertising the posts. The District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, by letter dated 23.06.2016, granted permission to advertise all the posts, including the post of Clerk. Pursuant to this, the Manager of the institution advertised the posts, including the post of Clerk, in two newspapers: Swatantra Jantmitra and Swatantra Bharat, dated 26.07.2016.
5. Pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement, a large number of applications were received and accordingly, interview letters dated 09.05.2017 were issued to all eligible candidates, fixing 25.05.2017 as the date for the interview before the selection committee.
6. As per Rule 14 of the Rules of 1984, the selection committee was required to be constituted in such a manner that one member would be nominated by the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur. Accordingly, by letter dated 09.05.2017, the Manager requested the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gorakhpur, to nominate one representative for constituting the selection committee, which was scheduled on 25.05.2017. In response, the District Basic Shiksha Adhikari nominated and sent Shri Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Principal of Rajkiya High School Barigaon, Belghat, Gorakhpur, as the expert for the selection committee.
7. On 25.05.2017, the select
State of Uttar Pradesh & 2 Others vs. Gunjan Singh & Another
Failure to communicate a decision within the prescribed period leads to deemed approval of appointment, despite procedural lapses.
The appointments were found to be void ab initio due to the lack of essential qualifications and the flawed selection process.
The recruitment process for educational appointments must be conducted fairly, transparently, and in accordance with statutory provisions to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice and e....
Point of law: If the District Basic Education Officer does not communicate his decision within one month from the date of receipt of the papers under clause (4), he shall be deemed to have accorded a....
Glaring illegalities in the selection procedure can be challenged, and the Court has the authority to set aside the selection process and direct a restart in accordance with the applicable rules.
The judgment establishes the principle that public officers must act reasonably and responsibly in their official duties, conforming to the rule of law. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring ....
Point of law: If the District Basic Education Officer does not communicate his decision within one month from the date of receipt of the papers under clause (4), he shall be deemed to have accorded a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.