SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 579

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
MANISH MATHUR, J.
Abhay Kumar @ Dheeraj Ojha – Petitioner
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Verma And Others – Respondents
Election Petition No. 6 of 2022
Decided On : 25-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: In Person, Amol Kumar Srivastava, Chetan Kumar Tiwari, Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, Mahendra Bahadur Singh, Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Pramod Kumar Pandey, Rajnish Ojha, Sakshi Singh, Santosh Kumar Pandey, Shivanshu Mishra, Vikas Singh Counsel.
For the Respondents: Santosh Kumar Yadav, Abhinav Trivedi, Aishvarya Mathur, Anil Kumar Yadav, Anupam Mehrotra, Ashutosh Chaurasia, Dr. Pooja Singh, Kuldeep Pati Tripathi, Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Sudhir Pande, Vijay Vikram Singh.

A recrimination petition under the election law is in the nature of a counter-claim subject to the Code of Civil Procedure. While notice is procedurally required for such counter-claims, the court may defer its issuance if the petition is consequential to the primary election dispute's outcome.

Headnote:(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 86, 87, 97 and 98 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order V, Rule 9, Order VII, Rule 9 and Order VIII, Rule 6-A(4) - High Court Rules - Chapter XV-A, Rules 5 and 12 - Election petition - Recrimination petition - Nature and procedural requirements - A recrimination petition filed under the Act is in the nature of a counter-claim - Provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to election petitions as nearly as possible - Requirement of notice in a counter-claim - Due to the consequential nature of a recrimination petition, which depends upon the final outcome of the primary election petition, notice requirements are to be balanced against judicial economy - Issuance of notices deferred pending final judgment in the main petition. (Paras 11, 26, 30, 42, 46, 47)

Facts of the case:
A recrimination petition was filed in the course of an election dispute, challenging the validity of the election of a candidate. The petitioner requested that fresh notices be issued to all parties involved, contending that the petition acts as a counter-claim and therefore mandated formal service under civil procedural norms. The opposing argument held that such petitions are secondary and contingent, not requiring immediate notice.

Findings of Court:
The court held that a recrimination petition constitutes a counter-claim under civil procedure law. While procedural rules generally require the issuance of notices for counter-claims to ensure all parties are aware of incoming charges, the court emphasized that a recrimination petition is inherently consequential and only requires adjudication should the primary election petition succeed in voiding the initial result. Therefore, while notice is a procedural right, its issuance at this preliminary stage would be premature.

Issues: The main issues were whether a recrimination petition requires mandatory issuance of notices to respondents as per civil procedural standards and whether such notices must be served immediately upon their filing in an election trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that a recrimination petition functions as a counter-claim, thus invoking the notice requirements under civil procedure statutes. However, because the petition's validity and necessity are strictly tied to the ultimate decision of the main election petition, the court exercised its discretionary power to keep the issuance of notices in abeyance to ensure efficient trial proceedings.

Result: Application for issuance of notices directed to be kept in abeyance pending final decision of the election petition.

Table of Content
1. procedural background of the recrimination petition application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments for issuance of notice under cpc and rp act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. arguments against notice necessity based on consequential nature. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
4. analysis of legal frameworks for election petitions and counter-claims. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
5. determination that recrimination petitions require formal notice to respondents. (Para 42 , 43)
6. deferment of notice issuance until election petition outcome is determined. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)

JUDGMENT :

MANISH MATHUR, J.

Order On C. M. Application No.IA/43 of 2024.

1. Application has been filed for issuance of notice on I.A. No.32 of 2024 filed by respondent No.1 of Election Petition. The said application has been filed pertaining to Recrimination Petition which has been numbered as I.A. No. 32 of 2024 in the Election Petition.

2. Heard Mr. Anupam Mehrotra, learned counsel for recriminator/ respondent no.1 to the Election Petition, Mr. Sudeep Seth, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Rajnish Ojha, learned counsel for Election Petitioner and Mr. Sudhir Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no.4 in the Election Petition.

3. Mr. Anupam Mehrotra, learned counsel for recriminator/ respondent no.1 has submitted that earlier subsequent to filing of Election Petition, recrimination petition had been filed under Section 97 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 with the said recrimination petition initially being registered as Writ C No.4613 of 2022 in which notice was issued vide order dated 21.07.2022 whereafter the said recrimination petition was directed to be listed as an interim application in the election petition itself resulting as application no.32 of 2024.

4. It is submitted that since notice was issued initially in the writ petition and not in a recrimination petition, fresh notices are required therefore to be issued in the recrimination petition to all the respondents particularly since even when the recrimination petition was registered as writ petition, despite issuance of notices, such notices have not been served upon all the respondents.

5. Elaborating upon his submissions, learned counsel has placed reliance on Chapter XV-A, Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules pertaining to special provisions relating to the trial of election petitions and submits that the said provision clearly indicates the provision for issuance of notices in an election petition. It is submitted that such a notice is required to the respondents to put up their defence, file the written statement and for purposes of leading evidence.

6. He has also referred to Chapter XV-A, Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules to submit that the Court has power to give directions in matters of practice and procedure which is consistent with the provisions of Section 87 of the Act of 1951 including recording of evidence.

7. He has also adverted to Section 87 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 to submit that before the High Court, every election petition has to be tried as nearly as may be, in accordance with procedure applicable under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, to the trial of suits.

8. It is therefore submitted that since provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are applicable, provisions of Order V Rule 9, Order VII, Rule 9 and Order VIII, Rule 6A (4) of the Code are required to be followed.

9. It is submitted that in terms of Order VIII, Rule 6-A, procedure in case of a counter claim by defendant has been indicated and submits that in case of such a counter claim in respect of cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff, the same procedure is required to be followed as applicable to plaints & consequently as indicated in Order V and Order VII of the Code.

10. It is submitted that Order VII, Rule 9 of the Code indicates proc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top