SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Smt Deeksha – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP JAIN, J.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the corpus, Deeksha, is the wife of Arvind Kumar and is in illegal custody of the State, being kept in a Rajkiya Bal Grah (Balika), Vrindavan, Mathura against her wishes. It is submitted that the petitioner, being the husband of the corpus, is entitled to her lawful custody.

2. Per contra, learned AGA submitted that a criminal case is pending against the petitioner, who allegedly solemnized marriage with the corpus while she was a minor, and, as such, she has been lawfully detained in Rajkiya Bal Grah (Balika), Vrindavan, Mathura. It is submitted that since the corpus is in lawful custody of the State in pursuance of a judicial order, the present habeas corpus petition is not maintainable.

3. I have heard the learned counsel of the parties and perused the record.

4. A Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rachna and Another vs. State of UP and Others 2021 SCC OnLine All 211, held as under:-

"80. We accordingly come on our conclusions in respect of question nos. 1, 2 and 3 for determination as follows:—

Question No. 1:"(1) Whether a writ of habeas corpus is maintainable against the judicial order passed by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top