SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 707

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad, JJ.
Jag Prasad Yadav @ Jaggu - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
JAIL APPEAL No. – 589 of 2021
Decided On : 27-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Jail Appeal, Girish Kumar Dwivedi, Shreesh Kumar Mishra Atal
For the Respondent: G.A.

A conviction for murder requires proof of specific intent to cause death or injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to result in death. Acts committed in the heat of passion without pre-meditation, while dangerous, typically constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 304 Part II, 307, 323 - Culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Intent to commit murder versus culpable homicide - When an act resulting in death is performed in the heat of passion following a conflict, without evidence of pre-meditation or specific intent to cause death, the offense is more appropriately categorized under culpable homicide not amounting to murder rather than murder. (Paras 47, 54, 55)

(B) Appeals - Burden of proof - Prosecution is obligated to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt - Even where the act and the outcome are established, if the specific mens rea required for murder is not proven, the appellate court may modify the conviction to a lesser offense based on the evaluation of circumstances and evidence. (Paras 40, 50, 51)

Facts of the case:
Two young children were thrown into a well during an incident, resulting in the death of one child and injuries to another, as well as injuries sustained by their parent during a physical confrontation. The trial court convicted the accused for murder and other related offenses.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the prosecution successfully proved the occurrence of the incident and the involvement of the accused. However, the court found no evidence of pre-meditation or a specific intent to kill the children, characterizing the act as one performed in the heat of passion due to frustration. Consequently, the conviction for murder was set aside and replaced with a conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Issues: Whether the conviction under Section 302 is sustainable given the absence of evidence regarding pre-meditated intent to commit murder, and whether the circumstances warrant conversion to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that where an offender acts with knowledge that their conduct is likely to cause death, but lacks the specific intention to kill and acts in the heat of passion without pre-meditation, the offense falls under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code.

Result: Appeal partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. case background, procedural history, and trial court findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
2. parties' contentions regarding evidence reliability and motive. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. evaluation of evidence, eyewitness testimony, and medical corroboration. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
4. analysis of legal precedents regarding reliable evidence and reasonable doubt. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
5. determining intent and reclassifying murder to culpable homicide. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
6. final judgment, sentence modification, and release instructions. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)

JUDGMENT :

Rajnish Kumar, J.

(1) The instant jail appeal has been preferred by convict/appellant, Jag Prasad Yadav alias Jaggu, assailing the judgment and order dated 19.04.2019 passed by Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Faizabad, in Sessions Trial No. 171 of 2015 (Computer Registration No. 792 of 2015); State Versus Jag Prasad Yadav alias Jaggu, emanating from Case Crime No. 102 of 2015, under Sections 302, 307, 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (here-in-after referred to as “I.P.C.”) and Section 3(ii)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (here-in-after referred to as “SC/ST Act”), Police Station Kumarganj, District Faizabad.

(2) The case of the prosecution, in short, is that complainant, Ramlautan son of Suraju, resident of village Sakir Pithala, Police Station Kumarganj, district Faizabad, had submitted a written complaint at police station Kumarganj, district Faizabad on 22.04.2015, alleging therein that on 22.04.2015, a wedding procession ¼ckjkr½ had come to his village. In that procession, a person from his village, Jaggu alias Jagprasad Yadav son of late Ram Naval Yadav, had torn to shreds the motorcycle etc. and when the wedding party chased him from there, he (Jaggu alias Jagprasad Yadav) went to the door of Suraju of his village and picked up a boy, Shagun, aged 3½ years and a girl aged 1 year, lying on a cot at the door, who had come to their maternal home and thrown them into a nearby well at about 11:00 in the night. Upon hearing the children crying, nearby villagers took them out of the well and rushed them to Kumarganj hospital, where the doctor declared Shagun dead, while the girl survived. The dead body is lying on the road in front of the doctor. The boy Shagun is of Scheduled Caste community and the aforesaid Jaggu is of non Scheduled Caste community. Information is being given, the appropriate action may be taken.

(3) On the basis of the aforesaid report, F.I.R., bearing No.102 of 2015, under Sections 302 I.P.C. and Section 3 (2) (v) of the S.C./S.T. Act was registered at police station Kumarganj, Faizabad on 23.04.2016 at 00:10 hours.

(4) The investigation of the case was conducted by Circle Officer Navin Kumar Nayak. He, after getting copy of F.I.R., recording of the evidence of complainant and scriber of the F.I.R., reached the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan. Thereafter, S.I. Ram Bachan Ram had prepared the inquest report of the dead body of deceased Shagun. He, after collecting all the papers, sent the dead body of Shagun for post-mortem. He also sent mother of deceased, namely, Rekha wife of Dharamraj for medical examination.

(5) The post-mortem of the dead body of the deceased Shagun was conducted on 23.04.2015 at 03:05 P.M. at District Hospital, Faizabad by Dr. Gulrez Ahmad. On external examination, he found that height of the deceased was 81 C.M.; her body was well-built; her eyes and mouth were semi open; rigor mortis was present; and there was no visible injury on the body of the deceased. On internal examination, blackish layer seen in upper part trachea and in larynx over mucosa; left and right chamber of heart full; there was no smell from the stomach; stomach wall was normal and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top