HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad, JJ.
Jag Prasad Yadav @ Jaggu - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
JAIL APPEAL No. – 589 of 2021
Decided On : 27-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case background, procedural history, and trial court findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding evidence reliability and motive. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. evaluation of evidence, eyewitness testimony, and medical corroboration. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. analysis of legal precedents regarding reliable evidence and reasonable doubt. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. determining intent and reclassifying murder to culpable homicide. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 6. final judgment, sentence modification, and release instructions. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajnish Kumar, J.
(1) The instant jail appeal has been preferred by convict/appellant, Jag Prasad Yadav alias Jaggu, assailing the judgment and order dated 19.04.2019 passed by Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Faizabad, in Sessions Trial No. 171 of 2015 (Computer Registration No. 792 of 2015); State Versus Jag Prasad Yadav alias Jaggu, emanating from Case Crime No. 102 of 2015, under Sections 302, 307, 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (here-in-after referred to as “I.P.C.”) and Section 3(ii)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (here-in-after referred to as “SC/ST Act”), Police Station Kumarganj, District Faizabad.
(2) The case of the prosecution, in short, is that complainant, Ramlautan son of Suraju, resident of village Sakir Pithala, Police Station Kumarganj, district Faizabad, had submitted a written complaint at police station Kumarganj, district Faizabad on 22.04.2015, alleging therein that on 22.04.2015, a wedding procession ¼ckjkr½ had come to his village. In that procession, a person from his village, Jaggu alias Jagprasad Yadav son of late Ram Naval Yadav, had torn to shreds the motorcycle etc. and when the wedding party chased him from there, he (Jaggu alias Jagprasad Yadav) went to the door of Suraju of his village and picked up a boy, Shagun, aged 3½ years and a girl aged 1 year, lying on a cot at the door, who had come to their maternal home and thrown them into a nearby well at about 11:00 in the night. Upon hearing the children crying, nearby villagers took them out of the well and rushed them to Kumarganj hospital, where the doctor declared Shagun dead, while the girl survived. The dead body is lying on the road in front of the doctor. The boy Shagun is of Scheduled Caste community and the aforesaid Jaggu is of non Scheduled Caste community. Information is being given, the appropriate action may be taken.
(3) On the basis of the aforesaid report, F.I.R., bearing No.102 of 2015, under Sections 302 I.P.C. and Section 3 (2) (v) of the S.C./S.T. Act was registered at police station Kumarganj, Faizabad on 23.04.2016 at 00:10 hours.
(4) The investigation of the case was conducted by Circle Officer Navin Kumar Nayak. He, after getting copy of F.I.R., recording of the evidence of complainant and scriber of the F.I.R., reached the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan. Thereafter, S.I. Ram Bachan Ram had prepared the inquest report of the dead body of deceased Shagun. He, after collecting all the papers, sent the dead body of Shagun for post-mortem. He also sent mother of deceased, namely, Rekha wife of Dharamraj for medical examination.
(5) The post-mortem of the dead body of the deceased Shagun was conducted on 23.04.2015 at 03:05 P.M. at District Hospital, Faizabad by Dr. Gulrez Ahmad. On external examination, he found that height of the deceased was 81 C.M.; her body was well-built; her eyes and mouth were semi open; rigor mortis was present; and there was no visible injury on the body of the deceased. On internal examination, blackish layer seen in upper part trachea and in larynx over mucosa; left and right chamber of heart full; there was no smell from the stomach; stomach wall was normal and



Mohar Singh and others vs State of Punjab
Virsa Singh Vs. The State of Punjab
Pulicherla Nagarjun Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh;
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on intention and circumstances, with the court applying Exception-4 of Section 300 IPC in cases of sudden quarrel.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and the application of legal provisions in establishing guilt and justifying the conviction and sentence.
The court established that sudden provocation can reduce a murder charge to manslaughter, particularly in domestic disputes.
Altercation due to a love triangle led to unintentional death; court ruled for culpable homicide, not murder, emphasizing the lack of premeditation.
The court modified convictions from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the need for established common intention among accused, reflecting principles of reasonable doubt....
Point of law : Motive plays an important role and becomes a compelling force to commit a crime and therefore motive behind the crime is a relevant factor for which evidence may be adduced.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'culpable homicide amounting to murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 304 of the Indian Pen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.