RAJESH TANDON
MURLI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAM SINGH – Respondent
( 2 ) BY the present civil revisions filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the revisionists have prayed for setting aside the order dated 11th May, 2005 passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court, chamoli, Gopeshwar, passed in Execution case No. 21 of 2004 whereby the Judge small Cause Court has allowed the objections filed by the opposite parties under section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code.
( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated, the suit for rent and ejectment was filed by late Sri Murli Dhar, father of the revisionists in the year, 1987. The suit was contested by the defendant no. 1 and was decreed on 16-3-1991.
( 4 ) THEREAFTER a revision was preferred being Revision No. 493 of 2001 by Sri Dalip singh and Sri Ram Singh, which was dismissed on 16th August, 2004. Following order was passed:
"counsel for the applicant has prayed some time to vacate the premises. The time to vacate the premises is granted to the applicant to vacate the premises by 31-12-2004 subject to the undertaking furnished by the applicant within a period of one month before the J. S. C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.