IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
U.C. DHYANI, J.
Shri Ashwin Chaudhry - Petitioner
Vs.
Smt. Kiran Chaudhry - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 862 of 2016 (M/S)
Decided on : 20-06-2016
Custody - Hindu Marriage Act - 26 - The court set aside the impugned order and directed the court below to take up the issue of custody of the child moved under Section 26 of the Act at the earliest possible and decide the matter by 28th June, 2016. Various judgments were referenced to highlight the paramount consideration of the welfare and interest of the child in determining custody.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to set aside an order passed by the Family Court in a divorce petition and obtain custody of the minor child. The child's welfare was a paramount consideration in deciding the issue of custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the court below should have decided the application under Section 26 of the Act first and not kept it pending for final disposal of the suit. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the court below to take up the issue of custody of the child moved under Section 26 of the Act at the earliest possible and decide the matter by 28th June, 2016.
Issues: The main issue was the custody of the minor child and the court's failure to decide the application under Section 26 of the Act in a timely manner.
Ratio Decidendi: The welfare and interest of the child are the paramount consideration in determining custody. The court emphasized the importance of promptly deciding custody matters and referenced various judgments to support this principle.
Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the court directed the court below to promptly decide the issue of custody of the child moved under Section 26 of the Act.
U.C. DHYANI, J.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs, among other:
“(a) Set aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2016 passed by the learned court of Shri Amit Kumar Sirohi, learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nainital in Divorce Petition titled as ‘Ashwin Chaudhary v. Kiran Chaudhary’ numbered as HMA No. 33/2015.
(b) Direct the respondent to produce the minor child in Nainital and send the minor child, Kushagra Chaudhary, to school to St. Joseph's College, Nainital.
(c) Grant joint custody and meaningful visitation rights to the petitioner, and;
(d) Restrain the respondent from removing the minor child, Kushagra Chaudhary, from Nainital without the prior written permission of the petitioner.”
2. The petitioner has filed a matrimonial suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) for obtaining a decree of divorce against the respondent on the ground of adultery. Till December, 2014, child (Kushagra Chaudhary) born out of wedlock of petitioner & respondent was studying with their parents at Nainital, where he was studying in St. Joseph College. In December, 2014, respondent shifted to her parental house at Nainital and, then, in March, 2016 she alongwith the child shifted to Dehradun, where the child was got admitted in Asian School in Class-VII. The child is also present in the Court alongwith her mother. During lunch break, this Court called the child in the chamber.
3. The law is abundantly clear on the point that child's welfare is a paramount consideration while deciding the issue of custody of a child. On 02.03.2016, the child had an occasion to meet his father on his birthday, which was celebrated at Nainital at the house of respondent's mother (i.e. maternal grandmother of the child). When the summer vacation started in the Asian School, the petitioner moved an application under Section 26 of the Act for custody of his child. Instead of deciding such an application, the court below postponed the hearing of the same on the ground that it will be decided at the time of final disposal of the matrimonial suit pending adjudication before the said court under Section 13 of the Act.
4. This Court was taken through the judgment impugned, which finds place at Annexure-1 to the writ petition. Learned Judge Family Court, vide order dated 28.03.2016, observed that the application under Section 26 of the Act shall be decided alongwith the matrimonial suit, which order is under challenge in the present writ petition.
5. Section 26 of the Act reads as follows:
“26. Custody of children. - In any proceeding under this Act, the court may, from time to time, pass such interim orders and make such provisions in the decree as it may deem just and proper with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of minor children, consistently with their wishes, wherever possible, and may, after the decree, upon application by petition for the purpose, make from time to time, all such orders and provisions with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of such children as might have been made by such decree or interim orders in case the proceedings for obtaining such decree were still pending, and the court may also from time to time revoke, suspend or vary any such orders and provisions previously made:
Provided that the application with respect to the maintenance and education of the minor children, pending the proceeding for obtaining such decree, shall, as far as possible, be disposed of within sixty days from the date of service of notice on the respondent.”
6. It says, among other things, that in any proceeding under this Act (read Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the context of this case), the Court may, from time to time, pass such interim orders with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of minor children, consistently with their wishes. It also provides that such an application shall, as far as possible, be disposed of within 60 day
Mausami Moitra Ganguli v. Jayant Ganguli
Shyamrao Maroti Korwate v. Deepak Kisanrao Tekam
Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal
Sheila B. Das v. P.R. Sugasree
Rosy Jacob v. Jacob A. Chakramakkal
Thrity Hoshie Dolikuka v. Hoshiam Shavaksha Dolikuka
Surinder Kaur Sandhu (Smt.) v. Harbax Singh Sandhu
Elizabeth Dinshaw (Mrs.) v. Arvand M. Dinshaw
Chandrakala Menon (Mrs.) v. Vipin Menon (Capt)
Paramjit Singh Lamba v. Smt. Prabjot Kaur
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.