SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(UK) 615

RAJIV SHARMA, ALOK SINGH
RAJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. V.K. Jemini, Dy. A.G.

JUDGMENT

Per: Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma, J.

Since common questions of law and facts are involved in the above-titled criminal appeal, hence the same are being taken up together and adjudicated by this common judgment.

2. These appeals are instituted against the judgment and order dated 29.10.2015/03.11.2015, rendered by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital, in Sessions Trial No.40 of 2014, whereby the appellants were charged with and tried for the offences under Section 302/201/34 IPC. The appellants were convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (each) and in default of payment of fine to under additional rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. The appellants were also convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years under Section 201 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (each) and in default of payment of fine to undergo additional simple imprisonment for a period of one month.

3. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that PW1 Nanhe Lal lodged a report on 19.01.2014, to the effect that his brother-in-law was living with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top