K.M.JOSEPH, SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
BABITA DHASMANA – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR SCHOOL EDUCATION UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
These two Appeals arise from the common judgment rendered in Writ Petition No. 2194 of 2017 (S/S). Appeal No. 530 of 2018 has been lodged by the 5th respondent Committee of Management of Mangla Devi Inter College (hereinafter referred to as the College); whereas the other Appeal has been filed by respondent no. 6 in the writ petition. The writ petition was filed claiming the relief of quashing the order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the second respondent Additional Director School Education. Further relief sought was to consider and promote the writ petitioner to the post of Lecturer (Sociology) against the vacancy available in promotion quota, which is lying vacant from 01.04.2015. In the College, there are six sanctioned posts of lecturers. According to the writ petitioner, three posts out of the said posts are to be filled up by promotion and rest three posts are to be filled up by direct recruitment. We are concerned with the post of Lecturer (Sociology). According to the writ petitioner, this post is earmarked to be filled up by promotion quota. One Rishi Pal Sharma, who was earlier serving as a Lecturer (Sociology) retired on 31.03.2015. It is, ac
Boucher Pierre Andre Vs. Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar
CIT Vs. Suresh N. Gupta (2008) 4 SCC 362.
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I
K.S. Paripooran Vs. State of Kerala and others AIR 1995 SC 1012.
Mumtaz Ahmad Vs. Deputy Director of Education, Allahabad Region
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.