JUDGMENT :

The challenge in this revision is made to the following judgment and orders:-

(i) judgment and order dated 10.08.2010, passed in Criminal Case No. 1394 of 2010, State vs. Sushil Kumar, (“the case”), passed by the Court of 2nd Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) /Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar. By it, the revisionist has been acquitted of the charge under Sections 467, 468 & 471 of IPC. But, he has been convicted under Section 419 & 420 of IPC. The revisionist has been sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 419 IPC, with the stipulation that, in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month. The revisionist has further been sentenced three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 420 IPC, with the stipulation that, in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month.

(ii) Judgment and order dated 08.12.2010, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 89 of 2010, Sushil Kumar Vs. State, by the court of 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar. By it, the appeal has been dismissed and convict