SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Subhan Ali - Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 272 of 2018 (Under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.)
Decided on : 20-09-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. D.C.S Rawat, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. T.C. Aggarwal, assisted by Ms. Lata Negi, Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between Section 376A and Section 376B of the IPC, their specific intent and social purpose, and the requirement for the court to apply its mind before taking cognizance of a case.

Headnote:

Criminal Case - Offences under Section 376A of the IPC - Section 376A, Section 376B - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 376A and Section 376B of the IPC and their applicability to the case. It highlighted the distinction between the two sections and their specific intent and social purpose. The court emphasized the use of the term 'woman' in Section 376A and 'wife' in Section 376B, and the different quantification of punishment under each section. The judgment also referred to Explanation 2 of Section 375 to differentiate between the two sections.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the registration of a criminal case against the applicant for offences under Section 376A of the IPC. The complainant, an ex-wife of the applicant, alleged sexual intercourse without her consent under the false assurance of remarriage.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the chargesheet under Section 376A was defective and in contravention of the basic intention of the section. It concluded that the cognizance taken by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate was not sustainable due to non-application of mind and ordered the chargesheet and criminal proceedings to be quashed.

Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of Section 376A and Section 376B to the case, the validity of the chargesheet, and the sustainability of the cognizance taken by the Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 376A and Section 376B, the distinction between the two sections, and the non-application of mind by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Final Decision: The C482 Application was allowed, and the chargesheet and criminal proceedings were quashed. The matter was remitted back to the Investigating Officer for re-conducting the investigation and submitting a fresh chargesheet if required.

JUDGMENT :

A very peculiar and a distinct situation, which has emerged for consideration is in the light of the arguments which has been extended by the learned counsel for the applicant, that the cognizance, which has been taken by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, for the offences under Section 376A of the IPC as against the present applicant by way of registration of Criminal Case No. 3954 of 2017, State Vs. Subhan Ali, is apparently not made out, and the entire investigation is vitiated from its inception.

2. The argument of the learned counsel for the applicant, is that the provisions contained under Section 376A, was substituted by Section 9 of Act No. 13 of 2013 w.e.f. from 3rd February 2013. As an effect of substitution of Section 376A, would only be attracted in those cases where on account of an act of an offence under Section 376 (2) of the IPC, it results into causing of death of a woman or causes a “woman” to be in persistent vegetative state. The word “woman” used herein under Section 376A would be a general term, the literal meaning of which as per the Oxford English dictionary would mean as under:-

    Woman. An adult human female a female worker or employee the phrase a little woman condescending by way of reference to one’s wife. It means a female scholar or author woman of the streets, the term woman specified would mean belonging to a group having a specified gender generally recognized by a society.

3. Whereas under literal meaning, would be a spouse, having legally married to man, recognized by the society to be a female who is legally entitled to bear a child, in a biological act of procreation. Thus in the dictionary ‘wife’ has been defined as under:-

    ‘Wife’ means a married woman considered in relation to her husband. This term would be a specific denomination to a female who is a social bond permanently attached in a relationship to a man.

4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant, that under either of the circumstances the offences under Section 376A, would not be made out against the applicant as the legislature has used the word ‘woman’, and the woman herein cannot be substituted to be read as ‘wife’.

5. As the factual drop of the present case goes it is that the complainant respondent No. 3, herein admittedly was a married wife of the present applicant, there had been a valid divorce between them and as per the allegations levelled in the FIR, it is contended by the complainant respondent No. 3 herein, that under an assurance to re-marry, the ex-husband i.e. the applicant herein, had committed an offence of sexual intercourse without her consent and in that eventuality, it was alleged that he was liable to be punished for the aforesaid offences as contained under Section 376A for which the FIR was got registered, being FIR No. 294 of 2017 at P.S. Chowki Basfodan, Tehsil, Kashipur, district Udham Singh Nagar.

6. A reference to the contents of the FIR becomes relevant for consideration, because it deciphers the fact of marriage, the fact of commission of offence and the fact of a discontinuance of relationship of husband and wife.

    ^^1- ;g fd izkfFkZuh dh 'kknh vc ls 6 lky iwoZ lqHkku iq= dyqok mQZ ,glku fuoklh ekSŒvkSYy [kka Fkkuk dk'khiqj ds lkFk gqbZ Fkh vkSj lqHkku dh cgcsr izkfFkZ;ks ds nks tqMok iqf=;ka vue o egd mez 3 lky Hkh iSnk gqqbZ] ysfdu izkfFkZuh us lqHkku o mlds ifjokj okyks ds Øwj O;ogkj dh otg ls izkfFkZuhZ u vc ls 6 ekg iwoZ lqHkku ls rykd ys fy;k Fkk vkSj izkfFkZuhZ vius ek;ds ujiruxj es jg jgh Fkh ysfdu mDr lqHkku izkfFkZuh dks cjxyk dj dk'khiqj fyok yk;k vkSj dgus yxk es eq> ls fQj ls fQj 'kknh d:aXkk vkSj cPpks dks ikywaxk vkSj fdjk;k Hkh nwaxk vkSj izkfFkZuh dks eksŒ ekfyd dkyksuh Fkkuk dk'khiqj es vc ls ढsg ekg iwoZ fyok yk;k vkSj izkfFkZuh viuh iq=h egd ds lkFk ekSŒ [kkfy dkyksuh es jg jgh FkhA

2- ;g fd okD;k fnukad 23-4-17 dh jkf= djhc 1-00 cts dks gS eqfYteku uaŒ1 lqHkku vius lkFk eqfyt uaŒ2 vQrj vyh] eqfyt uaŒ

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top