RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Mohit Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
1. The challenge in this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “the Code”) is made to the charge-sheet dated 29.11.2018 and summoning order dated 23.01.2019, passed in Criminal Case No. 454 of 2019, State vs. Anil Kumar alias Kala and Others, by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Dehradun, District Dehradun (for short “the case”) as well as the entire proceedings of the case.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. The case is based on an FIR, lodged by the respondent no. 3 (“the informant”). According to the FIR, the informant had taken Rs. 40,000/- loan from Sandeep Bansal Lala. She was continuously paying the installments, but she could not pay the entire amount. On 08.06.2018, Sandeep Bansal Lala telephonically called the informant and abused her. The informant took two months’ time to repay the loan. On 15.05.2022, the son of Sandeep Bansal Lala named Mohit Bansal visited the shop of the informant and demanded the money from the husband of the informant. Mohit Bansal abused and started beating the husband of the informant with the belt. When the mother-in-law of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.