SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 43

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Deepak Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Pradeep Chamyal, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Sangeeta Bhardwaj, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant-Deepak Gupta is in judicial custody in FIR No.130 of 2022, under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is argued that the applicant was earlier involved in some cases, in which, he has already been granted bail. The co-accused, in the instant case, has already been released on bail.

4. These facts are admitted by learned State Counsel.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail. Accordingly, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top