Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Deepak – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant Deepak is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.753 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 308, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail.
4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
The court considered the applicant's previous bail grants and the release of the co-accused in the instant case as factors warranting the grant of bail under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activi....
The court may grant bail after considering factors such as the nature of the case, the co-accused's bail status, and the applicant's criminal record.
In dowry death cases, the court must evaluate the evidence and circumstances surrounding the allegations, and if the evidence suggests personal disputes rather than dowry-related motives, bail may be....
The lack of support from key witnesses and the bail granted to co-accused can be considered as factors in granting bail in criminal cases.
The court considered the lack of evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged offenses and his lack of previous conviction as grounds for granting bail.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
