SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 11

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Rajnish @ Monu – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Lalit Sharma, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate, Mamta Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant- Rajnish @ Monu is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.395 of 2021, under Section 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Patel Nagar, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is argued that less than commercial quantity of smack was recovered from the co-accused, who according to the prosecution, named the applicant. It is also argued that the person from whom possession, the smack was recovered has already been granted bail.

4. These facts are not disputed by learned State Counsel.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail. Accordingly, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top