SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(UK) 467

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.S. Rautela, Advocate, Manoj Joshi, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant Pankaj Kumar is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.329 of 2022, under Sections 376, 506 IPC and 5(l)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, it is the case of the applicant that he has been falsely implicated; the victim and the mother, both of them have not supported the prosecution case during trial.

4. Learned State counsel would submit that the record does not reveal availability of any other forensic, electronic or biological evidence.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top