IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL, JJ.
Shri Tafazzul Hussain Ansari - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 82 of 2023
Decided On : 26-05-2023
Writ Petition - Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 & Uttarakhand Policy for Removal, Relocation and Regularization of Unauthorized Religious Structures on Public Streets, Public Parks and Other Public Places - Waqf Act, 1955 - Section 3(r), 4, 5 - The court dismissed the Writ Petition seeking relief against indiscriminate demolition of Muslim places of worship and a preliminary survey of auqaf, emphasizing the essential requirement of dedication and the definition of Waqf under the Waqf Act, 1955. The court rejected the petitioner's claim that properties used for purposes recognized by Muslim law automatically qualify as Waqf properties, highlighting the need for dedication by the owner and registration with the Waqf Board.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking relief against indiscriminate demolition of Muslim places of worship and a preliminary survey of auqaf. The court found the petitioner's statements vague and unsubstantiated, and dismissed the first and third reliefs. The court also rejected the claim that properties used for purposes recognized by Muslim law automatically qualify as Waqf properties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no merit in the Writ Petition and dismissed it, emphasizing the essential requirement of dedication and the definition of Waqf under the Waqf Act, 1955. The court highlighted the need for dedication by the owner and registration with the Waqf Board.
Issues: The issues revolved around the indiscriminate demolition of Muslim places of worship, the need for a preliminary survey of auqaf, and the interpretation of the Waqf Act, 1955.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the essential requirement of dedication and the definition of Waqf under the Waqf Act, 1955, rejecting the claim that properties used for purposes recognized by Muslim law automatically qualify as Waqf properties.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was dismissed, and pending applications, if any, were disposed of accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
Vipin Sanghi, J.
The petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition, in public interest, seeking the following reliefs:-
(ii) Issue a writ, rule, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 9 to conduct of preliminary survey of auqaf (waqfs) and publish list of auqaf in accordance with Section 4 & 5 of Waqf Act, 1995.
(iii) Issue a writ, rule, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents nos. 1-8 to restore the places of worship, shrines, mazars, etc. of Muslim Community in the State of Uttarakhand which have been demolished by the respondents nos. 1-8 illegally.”
2. The petitioner has made general statements, with regard to the alleged indiscriminate and arbitrary demolition of legal places of worship, shrines, mazars, etc. of Muslim Community. The said statements are completely vague and unsubstantiated.
3. Aforesaid being the position, the first and the third reliefs, in our view, cannot be granted in the present Writ Petition.
4. The second relief sought by the petitioner is for a direction to respondent no. 9 to conduct a preliminary survey of auqaf (waqfs), and to publish list of auqaf in accordance with Sections 4 and 5 of the Waqf Act, 1955.
5. At this stage, we may notice some relevant provisions of the Waqf Act, 1955. Section 3(r) of the aforesaid Act defines a “Waqf” to mean the permanent dedication by any person, of any movable or immovable property for any purpose, recognized by the Muslim law, as pious, religious or charitable. Therefore, it appears to us that, for creation of a Waqf, the essential ingredient is that, firstly, there should be a person, who owns movable or immovable property.
6. Secondly, that person should dedicate his own movable or immovable property for any purpose specified by Muslim Law as pious, religious or charitable.
7. The definition is inclusive. It includes a Waqf by user - such Waqf shall not cease to be a Waqf by reason only of the user having ceased, irrespective of the period of such cesser. It also includes a Shamlat Patti, Shamlat Deh, Jumla Malkkan or by any other name entered in a revenue record, and; “grants”, including mashrat-ul-khidmat for any purpose recognised by the Muslim law as pious, religious or charitable, and; a waqf-alal-aulad to the extent to which the property is dedicated for any purpose recognized by Muslim law as pious, religious or charitable, provided when the line of succession fails, the income of the Waqf shall be spent for education, development, welfare and such other purposes, as recognized by Muslim law.
8. The inclusions under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii) & (iv) in the definition of “Waqf”, to our understanding, cannot take away the primary meaning of the expression “Waqf”. A Waqf, by user, cannot be a mere user of a movable, or an immovable property for a pious, religious, or charitable use, recognized by the Muslim law simplicitor. It has to comply with the primary requirement of it being a dedication by a person of his movable or immovable property. Therefore, a Waqf cannot come into existence, when the property, which may be used for a pious, religious, or charitable purpose, as recognized by Muslim Law, is not the property of a person, but is public property, public land, or government land. The expression “a Waqf by user” only means that the owner of the property, movable or immovable, by his use, exhibits his intention to create a Waqf, i.e. dedication to his property for a purpose recognized by Muslim law as pious, religious or charitable.
9
The central legal point established in the judgment is the essential requirement of dedication and the definition of Waqf under the Waqf Act, 1955, emphasizing the need for dedication by the owner an....
The constitution of an inquiry commission by the State is valid despite challenges under the Waqf Act, 1995 when prior waqf declarations are arbitrary, devoid of proper procedure, and the property in....
The irreversibility of wakf property transactions based on the Wakf Act's provisions prohibits alienation, upholding the integrity of religious and charitable purposes over contested claims.
Civil courts retain jurisdiction to determine eviction claims even if waqf status is asserted, unless unequivocally proven as such. Defendants cannot contest landlord's title without substantiating t....
Construction of a Waqf property without registration can occur if established as Waqf by user prior to the amendment of the Waqf Act; the appellants failed to prove a prima facie case.
Expression ‘waqf by user’ finding place in Section 3 (r) (i) of the Act is a defined expression and is not qualified by any word to suggest that it has to be of immemorial user, the Court would have ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.