SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Arif - Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
First Bail Application No. 252 of 2023
Decided On : 10-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Raj Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. Pramod Tiwari

Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and the purpose of keeping the accused in detention during investigation is to secure their attendance, not punishment.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 - The court granted bail to the applicant, emphasizing that bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and that the purpose of keeping the accused in detention during investigation is to secure their attendance, not punishment.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a Bail Application for grant of regular bail in connection with a case under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, where beef and cutting tools were allegedly recovered at the spot and the applicant was arrested.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the submissions of both parties, found no reason to keep the applicant behind bars for an indefinite period and granted bail, emphasizing that bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception.

Issues: The issue was whether the applicant deserved bail at this stage, considering the allegations under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and that the purpose of keeping the accused in detention during investigation is to secure their attendance, not punishment.

Final Decision: The bail application was allowed, and the applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

The present Bail Application has been filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail in connection with the Case Crime No.05 of 2023, registered with Police Station Clement Town, District Dehradun for the offence under Section 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.

2. Heard Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. According to the First Information Report dated 13.01.2023, 56 kilograms beef along with cutting tools were recovered at the spot and the present applicant was arrested at the recovery site.

4. Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate, submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Nothing was recovered from the possession of the present applicant. There was no public witness at the time of the alleged recovery. The alleged recovery was planted. The applicant has no criminal history. He is in custody since 13.01.2023, and, he is a permanent resident of District Dehradun.

5. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State, opposed the bail application. However, he fairly conceded that according the instructions received by him from the Investigating Officer, the applicant has no criminal history.

6. Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the investigation is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.

7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

8. The bail application is allowed.

9. Let the applicant - Arif be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

10. Registry is directed to send a soft-copy of this bail order immediately by e-mail to the applicant-prisoner through the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary action.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top