RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Chandresh Mamgai – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
1. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek directions to the respondent no. 2, the District Level Development Authority, Nainital (“the Development Authority”) to open the seal placed on the old portions of the petitioners’ building, Parsi Lal Sah Studio Building, Mallital, Nainital (“the building”).
2. Facts necessary to appreciate the controversy, briefly stated, are as follows:
(ii) The petitioner no. 2 is the tenant of the ground floor of the building.
(iii) On 15.04.1999, the Development Authority accorded approval for necessary repairs of the building subject to certain conditions.
(iv) On 06.08.1999, the approval for repairs accorded on 15.04.1999 was cancelled.
(v) On 04.09.1999, again, the Development Authority accorded approval for necessary repairs of the building.
(vi) Pursuant to the approval dated 04.09.1999, the petitioners did not carry out any repair work.
(vii) On 29.11.2013, the petitioners again sought permission for the repairs of the building from the Development Authorit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.