PANKAJ PUROHIT
Vinod Singh Jeena – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Since all these writ petition(s) involve similar controversy, therefore they are being heard and decided together. For the purpose of brevity facts of Writ Petition No.942 of 2023, Vinod Singh Jeena is being taken up for consideration of the controversy.
2. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the advertisement dated 09.08.2021 (Annexure no.1) and notification dated 30.11.2022 (Annexure no.6) issued by respondent no.2, whereby six posts of “Physically Handicapped” category (now termed as “Differently-abled Persons”) in the Uttarakhand Combined State (Civil) Lower Subordinate Service Examination-2021 advertised pursuant to the advertisement dated 09.08.2021, have been reverted back to the Government and order dated 18.08.2023 issued by respondent no.1 whereby reversion of six posts of Differently-abled Persons to the Government has been affirmed by the State Government and decided to carry forward these 6 posts to next selection. 3. The facts shorn-off unnecessary details are that an advertisement was issued by the respondent-Commission on 09.08.2021 for recruitment on different posts of State (Civil) Lower Subordinate Service. The controversy to b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.