IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Pravesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Collector Dehradun and Another - Respondents
First Appeal Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47, 48, 49, 82, 83, 84 of 2018
Decided On : 28-11-2023
Land Acquisition Act - Parameters under Section 18(2) - 18
Fact of the Case:
The appellants sought reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, claiming that the limitation period for seeking reference started running from the date they received notice from the Collector about the award. The respondents argued that the limitation period started from the date the appellants received the awarded amount.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the limitation period for seeking reference under Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act starts from the date of knowledge of the essential contents of the award, not from the date of the award itself or the issuance of notice by the Collector. The court held that the appellants' failure to seek reference within six months of receiving the awarded amount barred them from making a reference.
Issues: Interpretation of the limitation period for seeking reference under Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act
Ratio Decidendi: The limitation period for seeking reference under Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act starts from the date of knowledge of the essential contents of the award, not from the date of the award or the issuance of notice by the Collector. The provisions of the Limitation Act do not apply, and any reference sought beyond the prescribed period of six months is legally barred.
Final Decision: The First Appeals lack merit and are dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
This bunch of First Appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, had been preferred by the respective appellants as against the impugned judgment allowing of an Application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, as preferred by the respondents, consequent to which the references as made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act by the Collector at the behest of the appellant has been rejected. In all these First Appeals, it’s almost a similar question, which is involved consideration; hence, they are being decided together for the purpose of brevity.
2. As far as First Appeal No. 35 of 2018 is concerned, though it too engages similar question but since there is pending substitution application being IA No. 15698/2018, seeking substitution of the heirs of the deceased appellant, who is said to have met with the sad demise on 14.08.2018. Since the said Application has been preferred well within time and remained unopposed, the same would stand allowed, the learned counsel for the appellant of this Appeal is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment and bring on record the heirs, as described in para 4 of the said Substitution Application.
3. A very interesting and marginally controversial issue, which has emerged for consideration before this Court in the instant bunch of First Appeals as against the respective orders of allowing of the Applications under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, is as to what would be the parameters prescribed under sub Section (2) of Section 18, of the Land Acquisition Act, for the purposes of seeking a reference of a dispute under Section 18 in the light of the restrictions imposed by sub Section (2) of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act is extracted hereunder:-
(1) Any person interested who has not accepted the award may, by written application to the Collector, require that the matter be referred by the Collector for the determination of the Court, whether his objection be to the measurement of the land, the amount of the compensation, the persons to whom it is payable, or the apportionment of the compensation among the persons interested.
(2) The application shall state the grounds on which objection to the award is taken:
Provided that every such application shall be made,.
(a) if the person making it was present or represented before the Collector at the time when he made his award, within six weeks from the date of the Collector's award;
(b) in other cases, within six weeks of the receipt of the notice from the Collector under section 12, sub-section (2), or within six months from the date of the Collector's award, whichever period shall first expire.”
4. This Court would be more concerned with regard to Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, as to what would be the period prescribed for seeking a reference under the proviso as contained to Section 18(2) of the Act. Sub Section (2) of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and the proviso as contained therein, has to be splitted in two parts for its interpretation as they both pertained to deal with different expression of law altogether. The first proviso (a) to sub Section (2) of Section 18 provides of seeking of a reference within six weeks from the date of the award in relation to those claimants or the land losers, who were present or represented before the Collector.
5. The instant issue in these appeals will not be falling within the proviso (a) to sub Section (2) of Section 18 of the Act, but rather the appellants have sought to bring their case within the ambit of proviso (b) to sub Section (2) of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.
6. He contends, that the period of limitation for the purposes of seeking reference at their behest would start running from the date when he was in receipt of the notice from the Collector, about rendering of the award as contemplated under Section 12(2) of the Act and its only upon the receipt of the notice fro
State of Punjab Vs. Mst. Qaisar Jehan Begum and another
Officer on Special Duty (Land Acquisition) and Another Vs. Shah Manilal Chandulal and others
State of Karnataka Vs. Laxuman
Bhagwan Das and others Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
The limitation period for seeking reference under Section 18(2) of the Land Acquisition Act starts from the date of knowledge of the essential contents of the award, and the provisions of the Limitat....
The knowledge of the essential contents of the award and the obligation to file a reference petition within the prescribed time are crucial for a valid reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisit....
The court established that under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the Deputy Commissioner has a mandatory duty to make a reference within 90 days, and failure to do so, along with the claimant's inact....
Courts must verify that references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act comply with statutory conditions for jurisdiction.
The court must decide land acquisition reference applications on merits, with limitation issues addressed only after proper issue framing.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.