SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Kar) 974

S. R. KRISHNA KUMAR
Nagendrappa – Appellant
Versus
Special Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.R.Nithyananda, Advocate, Chethan Kumar H., Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition is directed against the impugned judgment and award dtd. 7/9/2013 passed in LAC No.1/2011 & connected matters by the Senior Civil Judge, Harihar, whereby the said petition filed by the petitioners under Sec. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the L.A.Act') seeking enhancement of compensation was dismissed by the reference court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the 1st respondent - State as well as learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and perused the material on record.

3. The material on record discloses that pursuant to the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the subject lands, the respondents passed an award on 18/8/2004 and a notice of the same was served upon the petitioners - claimants on 2/4/2005, pursuant to which, the petitioners filed reference applications before the 1st respondent - SLAO on 20/5/2005 within the prescribed period of 90 days. However, the SLAO did not refer the matter to the reference court, as a result of which, the petitioners submitted a reminder application on 20/3/2008 to the SLAO, who did not refer the matter at that time also. However, subsequently, on 29/3/2009,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top