JUDGMENT :

The applicant to the present C482 Application has agitated his grievance as against the impugned order dated 06.09.2023, as it has been passed in Criminal Revision No. 126 of 2023, Siddhartha Batra and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others. The grievance of the applicant, first of all, it is as against an interlocutory order, whereby the Revisional Court, while entertaining the Revision as against allowing of an application under Section 156(3) of CrPC has granted an interim order, staying the effect and operation of the order dated 05.09.2023.

2. Primarily, the argument of the learned counsel for the applicants is on the basis of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court, as rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 330 of 2021, M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, whereby in those proceedings, the Hon’ble Apex Court was dealing with the interim order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition (ST) No. 2306 of 2020, whereby the Court was scrutinizing the interim order which was rendered in the said case to the following effect:

“no coercive measures shall be adopted”.

3. Learned counsel for the