Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari vs State of Gujarat

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 659

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Harshit S. Tolia, Adv. Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR Mr. Siddharth Ravi Kheskani, Adv. Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K.M. Natraj, ASG Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Brijesh Limbachia, Adv. Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, AOR Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Kamakshi Sehgal, Adv Ms. Ayushi Amod, Adv. Mr. Pranav Saigal, Adv. Ms. Ashita Chawala. Adv Mr. E. C. Agrawala, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned interim order dated 14.02.2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in respective Special Criminal Application Nos. 9112 of 2019, 9111 of 2019 and 9475 of 2019 by which the High Court while admitting the special criminal applications filed under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) has granted the interim relief and has stayed the further proceedings of respective criminal inquiry cases against the respondents – accused and whereby has stayed the further investigation with respect to the criminal proceedings initiated by the petitioner-complainant against the respondents – original writ petitioners before the High Court – respondents herein – original accused, the original complainant has preferred the present appeals.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that Special Criminal Application Nos. 9111 of 2019 and 9475 of 2019 were arising out of FIR being M. Case No. 2 of 2019 initiated by the appellant – original complainant. Special Criminal Application No. 9112 of 2019 before the High Court was arising out of FIR being M. Cas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 659

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNASiddharth Mukesh Bhandari – AppellantVersusState of Gujarat – Respondent

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Siddharth Mukesh Bhandari – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent