SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA, JJ.
Suo Motu PIL: In the matter of illegal construction In Corbett Tiger Reserve – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No.178 of 2021 (PIL), Writ Petition No.208 of 2021 (PIL)
Decided on : 06-09-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abhijay Negi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, Mr. Rahul Verma with Mr. Gaurav Kandpal, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the state's obligation to protect natural resources under the public trust doctrine and the responsibility to conserve valuable resources.

Headnote:

Illegal Construction - Environmental Conservation - Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Indian Forest Act, 1927 - The court discussed the illegal construction of roads and buildings in the Corbett Tiger Reserve and the illicit felling of trees, and the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and the Indian Forest Act, 1927 that were violated. The court emphasized the public trust doctrine and the responsibility of the state to protect natural resources.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved illegal construction activities and illicit felling of trees in the Corbett Tiger Reserve, leading to violations of environmental conservation laws.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the illegal construction activities violated the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, and the Indian Forest Act, 1927. It emphasized the public trust doctrine and the state's responsibility to protect natural resources.

Issues: The issues included illegal construction, illicit felling of trees, and violations of environmental conservation laws.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the state has a legal duty under the public trust doctrine to protect natural resources and emphasized the responsibility of the state to conserve valuable resources.

Final Decision: The court referred the matter to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for proper and uninfluenced investigation in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

A Writ Petition (C) No.8729 of 2021 “Gaurav Kumar Bansal Versus National Tiger Conservation Authority” was filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. A Committee of National Tiger Conservation Authority (in short, “NTCA”) was formed. The said Committee submitted its factual report based on field visit regarding illegal construction of bridges, buildings and water bodies by felling of trees between Pakhro Forest Rest House and Kalagarh Rest House in Corbett Tiger Reserve in the State of Uttarakhand and illegal felling of large number of trees in ongoing Pakhro Tiger Safari construction in Kalagarh Tiger Reserve Division. The Committee found that in order to allow illegal construction of roads and buildings in Corbett Tiger Reserve, Forest Officers had forged the Government records. The Committee recommended that all illegal construction in Morghati and Pakhro FRH campuses be demolished and eco-restoration work be undertaken with immediate effect and also the cost incurred for the same to be recovered from the concerned officers. The Committee opined that the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (in short “MoEFCC”) shall initiate action against the responsible officers as per the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and the Indian Forest Act, 1927. The MoEFCC vide its letter dated 12.08.2021, 17.09.2021 and 22.10.2021 directed the Chief Wildlife Warden of Uttarakhand to furnish a report on the complaints sent by Mr. Gaurav Kumar Bansal, Advocate regarding the illegal construction and illicit felling of trees at the locations in question within Corbett Tiger Reserve.

2. This Court has taken Suo-Motu cognizance of a news item, published on 23.10.2021 in “The Times of India” regarding the illegal construction activities being undertaken against the various forest laws in Corbett Tiger Reserve. The said matter has been registered as Suo-Motu Writ Petition (PIL) No.178 of 2021.

3. The Writ Petition (PIL) No.208 of 2021 has been filed inter alia praying for constitution of a Special Investigation Team to look into the allegations and to ensure a free, fair and transparent investigation.

4. Both these two petitions relate to a similar matter, therefore, these two petitions are being considered and decided by this common order.

5. The Suo-Motu Writ Petition (PIL) No.178 of 2021 will be treated as a leading case.

6. This Court issued directions in the Writ Petition (PIL) No.178 of 2021 on 27.10.2021 :-

    “8. Meanwhile, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (General), Uttarakhand, the respondent no.5, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife), Uttarakhand, the respondent no.6, and the Director of the Corbett National Park, Uttarakhand, the respondent no.8, are directed to inspect the site, and to submit a report with regard to the nature and extent of the illegal constructions being carried out, with regard to the persons, who are responsible for carrying out the said illegal constructions, and with regard to the concrete steps taken by the respondent nos.5, 6 and 8 against such persons, and against the illegal constructions.”

7. In compliance to the said direction dated 27.10.2021, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (General), Uttarakhand, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife) and the Director of the Corbett National Park, Uttarakhand made a site inspection on 30.10.2021. The team together visited Pakhro Tiger Safari and Pakhro FRH, Morghati FRH, Kalagarh FRH in Kalagarh Tiger Reserve Division and Saneh Forest Rest House in Lansdowne Forest Division. On the basis of the site inspection, a report was submitted with these conclusion :-

    “a. For constructions of buildings at Morghatti, there is no approval from the competent authority. It is in violation of both Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

b. For entire construction works carried out at Pakhrau Tiger Safari,

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top