SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Neeraj Singh Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
A very peculiar argument has been raised by the learned counsel for the applicant while putting a challenge to the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1847 of 2023, Jeevan Vs. Neeraj Singh Adhikari, being the complaint proceedings drawn for the offences under Sections 504 and 506 of IPC.
2. Firstly, the learned counsel for the applicant has argued the matter that the complainant has not approached the Court with clean hands for the reason being that much prior to the registration of the complaint under Section 156(3) of CrPC on 04.03.2023, since the complainant has not disclosed the fact about the proceedings under Section 107 to be read with Section 116 of CrPC, it will amount that the respondent complainant had not approached the Court with clean hands.
3. Secondly, he argues that the complaint proceedings would be bad in the eyes of law, because initiation of the complaint proceedings, at a subsequent stage will amount to be a recurring proceedings for the same cause of action without disclosing the fact of institution of the earlier proceedings under Section 107 to be read with Section 116 of CrPC.
4. Thirdly, the learned counsel for the applicant ar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.