SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 456

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Neeraj Singh Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Vinoda Nand Barthwal.
For the State : Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, AGA.

JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

A very peculiar argument has been raised by the learned counsel for the applicant while putting a challenge to the proceedings of Complaint Case No. 1847 of 2023, Jeevan Vs. Neeraj Singh Adhikari, being the complaint proceedings drawn for the offences under Sections 504 and 506 of IPC.

2. Firstly, the learned counsel for the applicant has argued the matter that the complainant has not approached the Court with clean hands for the reason being that much prior to the registration of the complaint under Section 156(3) of CrPC on 04.03.2023, since the complainant has not disclosed the fact about the proceedings under Section 107 to be read with Section 116 of CrPC, it will amount that the respondent complainant had not approached the Court with clean hands.

3. Secondly, he argues that the complaint proceedings would be bad in the eyes of law, because initiation of the complaint proceedings, at a subsequent stage will amount to be a recurring proceedings for the same cause of action without disclosing the fact of institution of the earlier proceedings under Section 107 to be read with Section 116 of CrPC.

4. Thirdly, the learned counsel for the applicant ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top