IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL, JJ.
Municipal P.G. College, Mussoorie and Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 291 of 2023
Decided On : 18-10-2023
UGC Regulations - Selection Committee for Assistant Professors - The court permitted the petitioner to proceed with the selection process without the nominee of the State Government, but mandated strict compliance with UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in the Universities and Colleges and Other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, particularly Regulation 5 defining the constitution of the selection committees and guidelines on selection procedure.
Fact of the Case:
The State decided not to nominate any member on the selection committee to fill up the vacant posts of Assistant Professors by the petitioner-college due to its affiliation with a Central University. The court permitted the petitioner to proceed with the selection process without the nominee of the State Government, subject to strict compliance with UGC Regulations.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the writ petition and the interim relief application, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the selection process without the nominee of the State Government, but with the condition of strict compliance with UGC Regulations.
Issues: Nomination of members on the selection committee for Assistant Professors in a college affiliated with a Central University, compliance with UGC Regulations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the need for the petitioner to adhere to UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in the Universities and Colleges and Other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, particularly Regulation 5 defining the constitution of the selection committees and guidelines on selection procedure.
Final Decision: The writ petition and the interim relief application were disposed of, allowing the petitioner to proceed with the selection process without the nominee of the State Government, subject to strict compliance with UGC Regulations.
JUDGMENT :
Vipin Sanghi, J.
Though steps have not been taken to serve the UGC, counsel is present, and puts in appearance.
2. Mr. Pande, who appears for the State, has tendered instructions dated 17.10.2023, which are taken on record. He submits that in terms of the instructions, the State has decided not to nominate any member on the selection committee to fill up the vacant posts of Assistant Professors by the petitioner-college. The reason cited is that the petitioner-college is affiliated to respondent No. 3-University, which is a Central University.
3. Aforesaid being the position, we permit the petitioner to proceed with the selection process without the nominee of the State Government. However, the petitioner shall strictly comply with the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in the Universities and Colleges and Other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018, and, in particular, Regulation 5 which defines the constitution of the selection committees, and guidelines on selection procedure. Since the posts to which the petitioner wishes to make appointments are posts of Assistant Professors in the petitioner-College, the petitioner shall ensure compliance of Regulation 5.1-V, which reads as follows :
(a) The Selection Committee for the post of Assistant Professor in Colleges, including Private and constituent Colleges shall consist of the following persons:
(i) Chairperson of the Governing Body of the College or his/her nominee from amongst the members of the Governing body, who shall be the Chairperson of the Committee.
(ii) The Principal of the College.
(iii) Head of the Department / Teacher-incharge of the subject concerned in the College.
(iv) Two nominees of the Vice-Chancellor of the affiliating university, of whom one should be a subject-expert. In case of colleges notified/declared as a minority educational institution, two nominees of the Chairperson of the college from out of a panel of five names, preferably from the minority community, recommended by the Vice-Chancellor of the affiliating university, from the list of experts suggested by the relevant statutory body of the college, of whom one should be a subject-expert,
(v) Two subject-experts not connected with the college who shall be nominated by the Chairperson of the College governing body out of a panel of five names recommended by the Vice-Chancellor from the list of subject experts approved by the relevant statutory body of the university concerned. In case of colleges notified/declared as minority educational Institutions, two subject experts not connected with the University nominated by the Chairperson of the Governing Body of the College out of the panel of five names, preferably from the minority communities, recommended by the Vice-Chancellor from the list of subject experts approved by the relevant statutory body of the College,
(vi) An academician representing SC/ST/OBC/Minority/Women/Differently-abled categories, if any of candidates belonging to any of these categories is the applicant, to be nominated by the Vice-Chancellor, if any of the above members of the selection committee does not belong to that category.
(b) Five members, including two outside subject experts, shall constitute the quorum.”
4. The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
5. Interim Relief Application (IA No. 01 of 2023) also stands disposed of.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for strict compliance with UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in the....
The presence of the Chairperson is mandatory for the validity of a Selection Committee under UGC Regulations, and failure to comply invalidates the committee's proceedings.
Post-appointment compliance with regulatory frameworks is necessary to validate appointments as legal and legitimate under UGC guidelines.
The constitution of the Selection Committee for Assistant Professors must comply with UGC Regulations, which require the Vice Chancellor to chair the committee.
UCG Regulations has not been adopted by State Government and only reference made in respect to selection to post of Vice Chancellor of University is screening of applicants on their eligibility on ba....
The composition of selection committees for academic positions must meet statutory requirements; violations permit candidates to challenge the process, regardless of their participation.
Point of Law : If the procedure requires that the Selection Committee is also required to follow the provisions of the UGC Regulations of 2018, it may do so, in doing so, it cannot be construed that ....
Judicial review of selection processes for public employment is limited; courts should not interfere unless there are proven irregularities or mala fides.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.