IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Gitali Saikia D/o Late Prafulla Chandra Saikia - Appellant
Versus
The State of Assam and Others - Respondents
W.P. (C) Nos. 2653, 3298 of 2023
Decided On : 21-05-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of multiple parties in joint petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge to selection process for principal based on alleged illegalities. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for and against legality of selection process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal standards for judicial review of selection processes. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. analysis of qualifications of selection committee members. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. judgment emphasizes legality of selection committees. (Para 26 , 34) |
| 7. discussion on estoppel in relation to selection challenges. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. final determination of legality regarding ugc guidelines. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 9. order to initiate fresh selection process. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. P.J. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3; Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned Standing counsel for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. P.P. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5 and Mr. P. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6.
2. By this common Judgment and Order, it is proposed to dispose of these two writ petitions, being WP(C) No. 2653/2023 and WP(C) No. 3298/2023, filed by the same petitioner, namely, Dr. Gitali Saikia, as the issues involved in both the petitions are same and the parties are also identical.
3. In WP(C) No. 2653/2023, the petitioner, namely, Dr. Gitali Saikia, has challenged the selection of the respondent No. 6, namely, Dr. Birinchi Kumar Bora to the post of Principal, H.C.D.G. College, Nitaipukhuri, Sivasagar and to set aside and quash the selection list, so prepared, pursuant to the interview held on 18.04.2023, and also to hold fresh selection process for the abovementioned post as per relevant Rules and guidelines.
3.1. And in WP(C) No. 3298/2023, the petitioner, Dr. Gitali Saikia has prayed for setting aside the order dated 20.05.2023, passed by the respondent No. 2, being Memo No. DHE/CE/AC/PI/259/23/141-A, whereby the respondent No. 6 has been appointed as Principal of H.C.D.G. College, Nitaipukhuri, Sivasagar, and also to declare and adjudge the selection as unconstitutional and violative of Rules and procedure laid down in the Assam College Employees (Provincialisation) Rules, 2010, and also to set aside the select list prepared pursuant to interview held on 18.04.2023, and also to hold fresh selection for the post of Principal.
Background facts:-
4. The background facts, leading to filing of the present petitions, are briefly stated as under:
“The petitioner, Dr. Gitali Saikia was appointed as Lecturer in the English Department in H.C.D.G. College, Nitaipukhuri and accordingly, she joined on 01.12.1995. During the course of her service in the said department, she was promoted to the post of Head of the Department in English on 01.12.2009 and she has a teaching experience of 27 years with many published books and research papers. Thereafter, an advertisement was published on 07.03.2023, for filling up the post of Principal in H.C.D.G. College, Nitaipukhuri and accordingly, having fulfilled the requisite qualification and experience, she applied for the post and appeared in the interview on 18.04.2023 and altogether, three candidates applied for the said post and she faired well in the interview. Thereafter, the petitioner came to know that the selection committee was not constituted as per Rules by obtaining reply in RTI application and then, she had submitted an application before the Vice-chancellor, Dibrugarh University highlighting the defects and malpractices adopted in the said process and requested to take necessary action, but the same failed to evoke any response.
Thereafter, she preferred a writ petition, being WP(C) No. 2653/2023, before this Court wherein, vide order dated 17.05.2023, a direction was issued to the counsel for the Higher Education Department as to whether any guardian member was included in the selection committee, fixing the matter on 19.06.2023. The
Kalyani Mathivanan vs. K.V. Jeyaraj and Others
Gambhirdan K. Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Raj Kumar and Ors. vs. Shakti Raj and Ors.
Jagdish Prasad Sharma and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Ors.
Ramjit Singh Kardam vs. Sanjeev Kumar
Abdul Hye vs. State of Assam and Ors.
Ashok Kumar and Anr. vs. State of Bihar and Ors.
Dr. G. Sarana vs. University of Lucknow and Ors.
Union of India and Ors. vs. Dhanwanti Devi and Ors.
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke vs. Dr. B.S. Mahajan
Secy. (Health) Deptt. of Health & F.W. vs. Dr. Anita Puri
M.V. Thimmaiah vs. Union Public Service Commission
Om Prakash Poplai and Rajesh Kumar Maheshwari vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
The composition of selection committees for academic positions must meet statutory requirements; violations permit candidates to challenge the process, regardless of their participation.
Point of Law : If the procedure requires that the Selection Committee is also required to follow the provisions of the UGC Regulations of 2018, it may do so, in doing so, it cannot be construed that ....
The selection process for public service positions must comply with established guidelines and norms, and candidates can challenge the legality of the process even after participating in it if there ....
The main legal point established is that the approval of the Director of Higher Education is crucial for the finalization of the selection process for academic appointments in provincialized colleges....
Writ of mandamus – Employment and service matter – Appointment of Principle of college - Selection Process - Appointment of Principal in College has to be as per recommendation of Selection Committee....
The court ruled that administrative decisions regarding college principal appointments may be reviewed for compliance with statutory regulations, particularly UGC Guidelines, emphasizing the importan....
Point of Law : Selection process has not yet been concluded, this Court should not entertain the present petition so far relating to the question of allotment of mark and the Director be allowed to e....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.