Prem Gangwar vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 279

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Prem Gangwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi with Mr. Karan Singh Dugtal.
For the State : Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, AGA.
For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Anand.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

Applicant Prem Gangwar is in judicial custody in FIR No.182 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. This is the second bail application of the applicant. The first bail application has already been rejected on merits on 01.12.2023.

4. According to the FIR, on 23.05.2023, the applicant Prem Gangwar along with the co-accused attacked the informant and her family members. There has been specific role assigned in the FIR that the applicant attacked Naresh with the help of Daanv (an iron rod with sharp edged ends), due to which, he sustained grievous injuries. In fact, on 01.12.2023, bail applications of the applicants Om Prakash and Pawan Kumar have been allowed by this Court.

5. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the bail application of applicant Prem Gangwar was rejected on the ground that he is the author of the injury sustained by Naresh. But, it is argued that one of the co-accused, who is Child-in-Conflict with law, had undergone Inquiry No.177 of 2024 before the J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document