SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 791

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
RAHUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant :Mr. Anil Kumar Bansal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. K.S. Rawal, Dy. Adv. General

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicant Rahul, who is in judicial custody in FIR No.155 of 2019, under Sections 147, 149, 325, 307 and 504 IPC, Police Station Basant Vihar, District Dehradun, has sought his release on bail, which is basis of the Criminal Case No.1254 of 2020 “State Vs. Rahul" pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.

2. This is the second bail application of the applicant. His first bail application was rejected on 14.05.2020.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. The first information report in the instant case was lodged on 19.11.2019. According to it, on that date, the victim who is the son of the informant proceeded towards Dakpathar, Near Kanwali Chowk, the traffic was halted and from the opposite direction, a vehicle bearing registration no.UK07CA 7014, driven by the applicant, approached the victim. The applicant started abusing the victim and when the victim objected to it, according to the first information report, the applicant alighted from his vehicle and hit the victim on his head with an iron rod. The victim was taken to the hospital. It is this FIR, in which after investigation ch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top