RITU BAHRI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
State of Uttarakhand – Appellant
Versus
Satyesh Kumar alias Sonu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
The Criminal Reference and these two Appeals have arisen from a common judgment and order dated 01.12.2018/04.12.2018, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rudraprayag in Sessions Trial No.11 of 2017 “State of Uttarakhand vs. Satyesh Kumar alias Sonu and Others”.
2. The trial court has awarded death sentence to the appellant – accused Mukesh Thapliyal and the appellant-Satyesh Kumar alias Sonu for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, “IPC”) read with Section 34 IPC and referred the matter to this Court for confirmation of the same in terms of the provisions of Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
3. The appellant Mukesh Thapliyal and the appellant Satyesh Kumar alias Sonu have been further convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years each along with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each for the offence under Section 392 IPC, and in default of payment of fine, they have been directed to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three months.
4. The appellant Mukesh Thapliyal and the appellant Satyesh Kumar alias Sonu have been convicted and sentenced to undergo
Bhagwan Singh and Others vs. State of M.P.
C. Chenga Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Sujit Biswas vs. State of Assam
The judgment establishes the principle that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must present complete and conclusive evidence to establish guilt beyond all reasonable doubt. It....
The court emphasized that in criminal cases, mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof, and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence is essential for conviction.
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal Law – Appeal against conviction – Theory of last seen – Reliability of - The last seen theory comes into play where the time gap between point of time when Accused and deceased were seen las....
Circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain pointing to guilt, excluding any possibility of innocence, to sustain a conviction for murder and robbery.
Another important aspect to be considered in a case resting on circumstantial evidence is the lapse of time between the point when the accused and deceased were seen together and when the deceased is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.