SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 47

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA, JJ.
State of Uttarakhand – Appellant
Versus
Raju Das – Respondent
Criminal Reference No. 01 of 2018, Criminal Jail Appeal Nos. 18, 28, 29, 30 of 2018
Decided On : 13-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : J.S. Virk, Pankaj Joshi, Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Mohd. Matlub, Rajendra Singh Azad.
For the Respondents: R.P. Nautiyal, Garima Thapa.

IMPORTANT POINT
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

Criminal - Conviction and Sentencing - IPC Sections 302, 201, 392, 411, 120B - The court discussed the principles of circumstantial evidence and the necessity for a complete chain of evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, ultimately leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted for the murder and robbery of two individuals, with the prosecution relying on circumstantial evidence, including confessions and recoveries. The trial court sentenced them to death and life imprisonment, which was challenged in appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to establish a clear and complete chain of circumstances linking the accused to the crime, leading to serious doubts about their guilt.

Issues: Whether the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to uphold the convictions of the appellants under the relevant sections of the IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, all circumstances must be established and consistent only with the hypothesis of guilt, leaving no reasonable doubt of innocence.

Result: The appeals are allowed, and the appellants are acquitted of all charges under the IPC.

JUDGMENT :

ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

1. The Criminal Reference and these four Appeals have arisen from a common judgment and order dated 27.03.2018/30.03.2018, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun in Sessions Trial No. 39 of 2015 State of Uttarakhand vs. Raju Das and three Others. All the appellants-accused have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 392, 411 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short “IPC”).

2. The Trial Court has awarded death sentence to the appellant-accused Raju Das for the offence under Section 302 IPC and referred the matter to this Court for confirmation of the same in terms of the provisions of Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

3. Appellants Kundan Das, Guddu and Bablu have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.50,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo for two years each.

4. All the appellants have been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years each and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each for the offence under Section 201 IPC, and in default of payment of fine, they have been directed to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months. They have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years each and a fine of Rs. 25,000/- each for the offence under Section 392 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for a period of one year each. They have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years each and a fine of Rs.5,000/- each for the offence under Section 411 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for a period of one month each. They have been further sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs. 25,000/- each for the offence under Section 120B IPC, and in default of payment of fine, they have been directed to undergo further imprisonment for a period of one year.

5. The Criminal Reference will be treated as a leading case.

6. The prosecution case briefly stated is that Sub-Inspector Thakur Singh Rawat (PW4) was the officer-in-charge at Purola Police Station. On 31.10.2014, on receiving an information about the dead body of an unknown person in the bushes near the road, he reached on the spot along with other police personnel and conducted inquest proceedings. About seven feet long nylon rope (Material Ext. 48) and about four feet long white cotton cloth (Material Ext. 49) was tied around the neck of the deceased. The said nylon rope and white cotton cloth were seized by the police vide Memo (Ext. Ka.57). After preparing the inquest report (Ext. Ka.21), other formalities were performed to send the dead body for post-mortem examination.

7. The post-mortem examination of the dead body of the unknown person, aged about 32 years, was conducted by Dr. Bhagendra Singh Rawat (PW6) on 01.11.2014.

8. An FIR No. 15 of 2014 (Ext. Ka. 13) was lodged at Police Station Purola, District Uttarkashi on 10.11.2014 at 20.15 hrs pursuant to a written information (Ext. Ka. 1) received from Sub-Inspector Ravi Prasad (PW1). The FIR was registered by Constable Vikram Singh Tomar (PW2) against unknown person under Section 302 IPC and Section 201 IPC.

9. The investigation was handed over to Sub-Inspector Ravi Prasad (PW1).

10. Mriganka Das (PW9), resident of District Nadia, West Bengal, gave a report dated 29.10.2014 (Ext. Ka. 25) to Police Station Saket, New Delhi stating that his sister Moumita Das used to reside in Delhi. She went to visit Dehradun with her friend Abhijit Pal. His sister’s mobile phone number 08826454369 is switched off since 23.10.2014.

11. Durga Das Rathore (PW8), who was the Sub-Inspector posted at Saket Police Station, inquired into the said missing report. Call details of Moumita Das’s mobile phone number 8826454369 and Abhijit Pal’s mobile phone number 704271131

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top