IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit, JJ.
Dr. Vidya Sagar Singh - Petitioner
Versus
G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar & others. - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No.68 of 2020
Decided On : 12-08-2024
Career Advancement - Employment Benefits - Government Order 12.07.2002 - The court interpreted the eligibility criteria for counting past service under the Career Advancement Scheme, emphasizing the necessity of meeting specific qualifications and conditions outlined in the Government Order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Assistant Professor, sought to include his past service as a Veterinary Officer for benefits under the Career Advancement Scheme, which was denied based on eligibility criteria set by a Government Order.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not meet the eligibility requirements outlined in the Government Order for counting past service, and the denial of benefits was justified.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to have his past service counted for benefits under the Career Advancement Scheme despite not meeting the eligibility criteria.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the eligibility conditions specified in the Government Order must be strictly adhered to, and the petitioner could not claim parity with others who were granted benefits under different circumstances.
Result: The writ petition was dismissed, but the petitioner was to be granted all benefits available to Assistant Professors as per law within three months.
JUDGMENT :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 6 to grant benefit of past service, rendered in the Animal Husbandry Department of the State of Rajasthan, to the petitioner for the period 01-04-1998 to 19-02-2007, for availing benefits under ‘Career Advancement Scheme’ with all consequential benefits of service.
III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Associate Professor and Professor, adding his past service of 11 years and 10 months, under ‘Career Advancement Scheme’ with all consequential benefits of service.”
2. Petitioner is serving as Assistant Professor in Department of Veterinary Parasitology in G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar. He was appointed to the said post vide order dated 09.06.2006. It is not in dispute that, before his appointment as Assistant Professor, petitioner was employed in Animal Husbandry Department of State of Rajasthan, where he was appointed as Veterinary Assistant Surgeon vide order dated 24.03.1995 and the said post was re-designated as Veterinary Officer w.e.f. 01.04.1998. The post of Veterinary Officer, on which petitioner served, was carrying pay scale of Rs. 8,000-13,500.
3. After his appointment in G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, petitioner made representation to add his past services rendered as Veterinary Officer, for availing benefit under Career Advancement Scheme. The Chief Personnel Officer of the University, vide order dated 07.01.2013, allowed petitioner’s representation and permitted adding his past services for grant of benefit under Career Advancement Scheme. The said order, however, was cancelled on 16.09.2013 by the Chief Personnel Officer. In the cancellation order, it was indicated that, in view of recommendation made by the concerned officers, the Competent Authority has decided to cancel the order dated 07.01.2013. Petitioner challenged the cancellation order dated 16.09.2013 by filing Writ Petition (S/B) No. 475 of 2014, which was disposed of vide order dated 14.11.2018, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the University that Competent Authority will consider petitioner’s claim for benefit of past services, as per law, within two months. The Chief Personnel Officer, thereafter, passed an order dated 21.01.2019 (wrongly mentioned as 21.01.2018 in the order), in which it was provided that the services rendered by the petitioner as Veterinary Officer, shall be counted for benefits under Career Advancement Scheme. The Chief Personnel Officer, however, passed another order on 06.07.2019, whereby the earlier order dated 21.01.2019 was kept in abeyance, till further orders. Challenging this order passed on 06.07.2019, petitioner filed Writ Petition (S/B) No. 498 of 2019, which was disposed of vide order dated 23.10.2019. Paragraph no. 5 of the said order is reproduced below:-
Eligibility for counting past service under the Career Advancement Scheme is strictly governed by the conditions set forth in the relevant Government Order.
Prior service in equivalent grade must be recognized for promotion benefits despite differences in pay scale.
The judgment established the principle that ad hoc service is eligible for counting under UGC Regulations for promotion and emphasized the requirement for authorities to provide substantive reasons f....
Ad hoc service should be considered for financial benefits, including arrears of salary, as approved by the State Government.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.