IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL, JJ.
Narayan Dutt Kandpal - Petitioner
Versus
Kumaun University, Nainital and others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 151 of 2021
Decided On : 15-05-2023
ad hoc service - grant of financial benefits - U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, Government Order dated 07.01.1989, Government Order dated 30.06.1992, Government Order dated 16.05.2017
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Lecturer (Chemistry), sought the computation of his ad hoc service for re-fixation of salary and release of arrears of salary. The State Government's decision on 16.05.2017 approved the ad hoc service for the purpose of granting seniority and promotion.
Finding of the Court:
The petitioner is entitled to the relief sought as the ad hoc service should be considered for financial benefits, including arrears of salary. The inaction of the respondents led to the petitioner invoking the jurisdiction of the Court.
Issues: The main issue was the computation of ad hoc service for the re-fixation of the petitioner's salary and the release of arrears of salary.
Ratio Decidendi: The ad hoc service of the petitioner should be computed for the re-fixation of his salary, and arrears of salary should be released within three months from the date of the court order.
Final Decision: The writ petition is allowed, and a writ of Mandamus is issued to the respondents to compute the ad hoc service of the petitioner for re-fixation of his salary and release arrears of salary within three months. The petitioner is entitled to penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum if the exercise is not completed within the stipulated period.
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Initially, petitioner was inducted in service as Lecturer (Chemistry) on ad hoc basis, pursuant to the appointment letter dated 25.03.1980 in the Constituent College (later known as ‘Sobhan Singh Jeena Campus, Almora’). The said ad hoc appointment letter of the petitioner was issued by the Vice Chancellor of the Kumaun University, in exercise of powers conferred by Section 13 (6) and (8) of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973. Pursuant to his appointment, the petitioner joined on the said post on 01.04.1980, as it appears from the appointment letter appended to the writ petition as Annexure No. 1. Petitioner was appointed in the pay-scale of Rs.700-1600. Subsequently, on the recommendations of the Selection Committee constituted under Section 31 (4) (a) of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, petitioner was appointed on temporary basis in Constituent College, Almora by the order dated 19.07.1986 and, subsequently, by the order dated 23.01.1990, service of the petitioner was confirmed w.e.f. 01.11.1988. The order of confirmation was issued by the Vice Chancellor of the Kumaun University, Nainital. Thereafter, by order dated 28.12.1993, the petitioner was granted senior scale of Rs. 3,000-5,000/- with effect from 21.07.1991. Senior scale was given to the petitioner on the recommendations of the Executive Council of the University on its meeting held on 28.12.1993. The erstwhile State of Uttar Pradesh issued a Government Order No. 91.GI/15-11-88-14(5)-87 dated 07.01.1989, wherein a provision has been made for grant of Senior Scale/ Selection Grade under the Career Advancement Scheme and the eligibility is prescribed under Clause-10 of the said Government Order, which reads as under :
(a) Completed 8 years of continuous and full-time service after regular appointment. This service must have been rendered on an approved post after regular selection in Permanent or Temporary capacity in any University or Post Graduate or Under-Graduate degree college or Institute (imparting instructions in degree and/or Post-graduate courses and/or guiding research) but shall not include service rendered in ad hoc capacity. Provided that benefit of one year or three years, as the case may be, will be allowed to such lecturer as possesses M. Phil. or Doctorate Degree;
(b) Participated in two refresher courses/summer institutes each of approximately four weeks duration or engaged in other appropriate continuing education programmes of comparable quality as may specified by U.G.C.; and
(c) Consistently satisfactory performance appraisal reports.”
2. Thereafter, by the subsequent Government Order dated 30.06.1992, certain amendments were carried out in the earlier Government Order dated 07.01.1989, whereby amendments were made in respect of eligibility. The relevant extracts of this order, which is appended to the writ petition as Annexure No. 6, is being quoted hereinbelow :
Ad hoc service should be considered for financial benefits, including arrears of salary, as approved by the State Government.
The court emphasized the importance of treating ad-hoc services as continuous for all purposes and the belated nature of recovery actions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to the principle of natural justice in decisions affecting employees, the authority of the Public Service Commission to m....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
Point of Law : Where range of discretion with authorities have been cut down to such an extent that only one decision is possible, Court may specifically direct authority to act in a particular manne....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.