Alim vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(UK) 158

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 158

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Alim – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap.
For the State : Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. and Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder.

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

Applicants Alim, Tahir and Aameer Khan seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0264 of 2024, under Section 3/5/11(1) of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 08.06.2024, police raided a premises and recovered beef and other articles. Some co-accused were arrested at the spot, who revealed the name of the applicants as the persons, who were also involved in the offence.

4. It is the case of the applicants that they have been implicated merely based on the statement of the co-accused; they are not previous convict.

5. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that the co-accused have named the applicants as the persons, who were also involved in the offence.

6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document