Rajo Kaur @ Rajjo vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 39

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Rajo Kaur @ Rajjo – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vikas Kumar Guglani.
For the Respondent: Manisha Rana Singh.

JUDGMENT :

RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.

1. Applicant Rajo Kaur @ Rajjo and Babli @ Ranu are in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 48 of 2024, Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Applicant Rajo Kaur @ Rajjo is in judicial custody under Sections 363, 370, 34 IPC and Section 16/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (“the Act”) and Applicant Babli @ Ranu is in judicial custody under Sections 370, 34 IPC and Section 16/17 of the Act. They have sought their release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The victim, a child, was found missing from her sister’s house, where she had come to stay. After a long search, she was found in the house of co-accused Mohan. He did not return her and told that he had purchased the victim. With the help of the police, the victim was rescued and taken back in her house by the informant. There, the victim revealed that, in fact, the applicant Rajo Kaur along with co-accused Babbu, visited her once, when she was all alone in the house and under some pretext, took her along with them. The co-accused Babbu took her at a place where the applicant Rajo Kaur left them. There, co-accused Babbu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document