Vartika vs State of Uttarakhand - 2024 Supreme(UK) 72

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 72

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Vartika – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shubhr Rastogi.
For the Respondents: Pramod Tiwari, Soniya Chawla.

JUDGMENT :

RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.

1. The challenge in this revision is made to order dated 21.10.2022, passed in Case No. 39 of 2022, Smt. Vartika and Another Vs. Jyoti Prakash, by the court of Family Judge, Laksar, Haridwar (“the case”). By it, the revisionist no. 2 has been granted Rs.1000/-, per month, as maintenance, by the respondent no. 2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The revisionist no. 1 filed an application, seeking maintenance from the respondent no. 2, on the ground that after marriage on 07.10.2013, the respondent no. 2 and his family members were not happy with the dowry and they would harass and torture the revisionist no. 1. Efforts for reconciliation were made, but they did not yield any result, and, finally, according to the revisionist no. 1, she was expelled from her matrimonial house on 03.04.2022. She is not able to maintain herself, whereas, the respondent no. 2 works in a private sector and earns about Rs. 80,000/- per month. With these averments, the revisionist no. 1 demanded Rs. 25,000/- for both the revisionists, which is the basis of the case.

4. In the case, an application for interim maintenance was also filed.

5. The re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document