SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 424

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Ravi Kant Sagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. J.S. Khati, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) :

The challenge in this revision is made to the order of interim maintenance dated 16.01.2024, passed in Criminal Case No. 104 of 2023, Smt. Anugya Shaiwal Vs. Ravi Kant Sagar, by the court of Family Judge, Dehradun (“the case”). By the impugned order, the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs. 30,000/- per month interim relief to the respondent no.2, Smt. Anugya Shaiwal.

2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the record.

3. It appears that the respondent no.2 filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”) seeking maintenance from the revisionist. According to the respondent no.2, she and the revisionist and were married on 27.02.2020, but after marriage, she was harassed and tortured for and in connection with the demand of dowry. She was beaten up at Ballari, Karnataka, where the revisionist resides. The respondent no.2 wanted to report the matter in the month of June, 2021, but due to fear of the revisionist, she could not dare to do so. According to the respondent no.2, she is not able to maintain herself, though she is highly qualified, whereas, it is stated that the revisionis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top