SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 229

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Aman Rajput alias Aman Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Reena Chauhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist :Mr. Shailabh Pandey, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in this revision is made to order dated 06.06.2024, passed in Criminal Case No.94 of 2022, Reena Chauhan Vs. Aman Rajput, by the court of Judge, Family Court, Dehradun (“the case”). By which, the revisionist has been directed to pay Rs.4,000/- per month to the respondent as interim maintenance, under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code”).

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The case is based on an application filed under Section 125 of the Code. According to it, the applicant and the respondent were married on 16.02.2021. Thereafter, the respondent was harassed and tortured in connection with demand of dowry. She is not able to maintain herself whereas, the revisionist is a lawyer and earns Rs.50,000 - Rs.60,000/- per month. In the case, an application for interim maintenance was also filed by the respondent. The revisionist did file objections denying all the claims of harassment and torture. It is the case of the revisionist that, in fact, it is the respondent, who has been harassing the revisionist.

4. It has been the case of the revisionist that their marriage was love marriage;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top