Back
ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
This is the Second Bail Application. The First Bail Application (No.1086 of 2019) was dismissed on 06.01.2022.
2. The present applicant – accused Ravi Kumar is in judicial custody for the offence under Sections 498A, 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 in connection with the First Information Report No.307 of 2018, registered at police station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar.
3. As per the First Information Report dated 05.12.2018, lodged by Rajendra Kumar, father of the deceased, the marriage of his daughter, namely Smt. Shivani was solemnized with the present applicant two years six months ago, as per the Hindu rites. After the marriage, applicant started harassing and torturing the deceased for the demand of dowry in the shape of Rs.1,00,000/- and one motorcycle. The said demand was not fulfilled by the informant. Due to that reason, the informant brought back the deceased to his house. The applicant went to the house of the informant after two months and took the deceased with him. On 02.12.2018, applicant committed the murder of the deceased due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Upon c
The legal principle established is that an accused person should not be kept in custody for an indefinite period without sufficient evidence or trial, and bail may be granted under reasonable conditi....
Bail is rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on personal liberty of individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution of India.
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and the purpose of keeping the accused in detention during the trial is to secure their attendance, no....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception, and the purpose of keeping the accused in detention during the trial is to secure thei....
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The court emphasized the gravity of dowry-related offenses and the need for careful consideration of evidence at the bail stage.
Lack of evidence of cruelty or harassment soon before the deceased's death as a factor in determining guilt.
The court may grant bail based on the statements of witnesses and the likelihood of the trial taking time for its conclusion, without commenting on the merits of the case.
The timing and specificity of allegations, completion of investigation, and framing of charges are crucial factors in considering bail applications in cases involving dowry demands and harassment.
The court affirmed that bail should be granted when the investigation is complete and the accused poses no flight risk, emphasizing the non-punitive purpose of pre-trial detention.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
