Back
RITU BAHRI, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Yaseen – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ritu Bahri, C.J.
The present Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 10.12.2015 / 11.12.2015 passed by Learned FTC / Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge POCSO, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar in Special Sessions Trial No. 90 of 2015 (New No. 518 of 2015), State vs. Yaseen, whereby accused-appellant Yaseen has been convicted for the offenses punishable under section 376(2) and 366 IPC. In respect of offence punishable under Section 376(2) IPC, the convict was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the remainder of the natural life along with a fine of Rs.50,000/-, in default of payment of fine, the convict was further directed to undergo six-month simple imprisonment. He has been also convicted under section 366 IPC, and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years along with a fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default of payment of which, the convict was further directed to undergo three months simple imprisonment. Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.03.2015, a written complaint was given by the father of the victim to Police Station, Jaspur, to the effect
The judgment reinforces the legal principle that offenses against minors, especially those with mental disabilities, warrant stringent punishment and protection under the law.
The court upheld the conviction for rape under IPC and POCSO Act, emphasizing the credibility of the victim's testimony and the need for sensitivity in child sexual assault cases.
The judgment underscores the judiciary's role in protecting minors from sexual exploitation, emphasizing that substantial evidence is crucial for conviction under the POCSO Act.
The judgment established the principle that the testimony of a victim of sexual assault does not always require corroboration and emphasized the need for sensitivity and proportionality in sentencing....
Conviction for rape can be upheld solely on victim's testimony if credible; minor's status under POCSO necessitates stringent punishment.
In cases of sexual assault, the victim's testimony is paramount, and the mental state of the victim does not diminish the credibility of her account; corroboration is not a strict requirement if the ....
Rape of girl child – Once a victim of rape, particularly, a child is found to be truthful in her deposition, said evidence is adequate to establish charge of commission of offence punishable under Se....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the strict application of the POCSO Act and IPC provisions to convict the appellant for sexually assaulting a minor girl below 12 years of age. The....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
