SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 349

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Kaushalya Negi @ Sona Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pawan Mishra.
For the Respondent: Pankaj Chaturvedi.

JUDGMENT :

PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this petition, petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to make regular payment of family pension to the petitioner and also to pay the arrears since November, 2013 with interest @ 18% per annum.

3. Facts of the case necessary for adjudication of present controversy are that husband of petitioner late Ram Singh Negi was serving in OPTO Electronics Factory, Raipur, District Dehradun who retired on superannuation on 30.04.2003. After superannuation, husband of petitioner provided joint photograph and other details to respondent no. 3 for pension which was duly attested and accepted by the Department. Unfortunately, petitioner’s husband passed away on 23.01.2011, and after his death, petitioner applied for grant of family pension which was duly sanctioned and granted to her. Suddenly, in the month of November, 2013, pension was stopped by Punjab National Bank, Branch Adhoiwala, District Dehradun distributing branch stating that in the ‘Pension Payment Order’ (PPO) of late Ram Singh Negi, Ex Junior Works Manager, OPTO Electronics Factory, Raipur,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top