IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Pankaj Purohit, J.
Neha - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No.877 of 2022, Writ Petition (S/S) No.878 of 2022
Decided On : 06-03-2024
Education - Appointment Eligibility - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Section 23(1); Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012 - The court interpreted the qualifications for teacher appointments, emphasizing the recognition of the Diploma in Education and its compliance with NCTE regulations, leading to the decision to allow the petitioners' eligibility.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, having qualified for the Assistant Teacher position, were denied appointment due to their Diploma in Education not being recognized as a minimum qualification under the relevant rules, despite being eligible according to NCTE regulations.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' qualifications were valid under the NCTE regulations and that the denial of their appointment was unjustified, as the relevant advertisement did not specify the need for special education qualifications.
Issues: Whether the petitioners possessed the minimum qualifications for appointment as Assistant Teachers under the applicable rules and regulations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the qualifications recognized by the NCTE should be considered valid for appointment, and the absence of specific requirements in the advertisement meant the petitioners were eligible.
Result: The writ petitions were allowed, directing the state to consider the petitioners for appointment as Assistant Teachers.
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Purohit, J.
Since common question of law is involved in both the writ petitions, hence, the same are taken up and decided by this common judgment. For the sake of relevance, the facts of WPSS No.877 of 2022 are taken into consideration.
2. In both the writ petitions, petitioners have prayed for issuance of writ order in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioners according to the counseling dated 11.04.2022 of the selected candidates enlisted in the third waiting list, in which the control numbers of the petitioners were 022247 and 026792 respectively, for the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary School).
3. The facts in the nutshell are that the petitioner had passed her Secondary School Examination and Senior Secondary School Examination from National Institute of Open Schooling and thereafter, she pursued B.A. (Bachelor of Arts) from Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Pune. The petitioner appeared and qualified the course of Diploma in Education (Two years Course) from Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal and subsequently, she qualified Uttarakhand Teachers Eligibility Test (UTET) in 2018 from Board of School Education, Uttarakhand, Ramnagar.
4. According to the petitioner, in the year 2020, the posts of Assistant Teacher in Government Primary Schools of Uttarakhand were advertised for 10 districts in the State of Uttarakhand, pursuant to which, the petitioner applied.
5. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement, to fill up the post of Assistant Teacher through direct recruitment, a third waiting list for counseling of selected candidates was issued, in which the petitioner participated on 11.04.2022. After counseling, 13 candidates were issued the appointment letters, but, the petitioner was denied for the same.
6. On enquiry, it came to the notice of the petitioner that her candidature has been rejected on the ground that she possessed two years’ Diploma in Education (D.Ed.), however, the said qualification possessed by the petitioner, is not mentioned to be the minimum qualification for appointment in the Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012. The notification issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) dated 23.08.2010 prescribing minimum qualification for Elementary Teachers for Class I to V is quoted herein below:
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 45% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known) in accordance with the NCTE (recognition norms and procedure) Regulation, 2002.
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 50% marks and four years Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.Ed.).
OR
Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 50% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (Special Education).
AND
Pass in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) to be conducted by appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by NCTE for the purpose.”
7. It is not in dispute that the institute from where the present petitioners have pursued their 2-years Diploma Course in Education is recognized by the N.C.T.E. or not.
8. Section 23(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 lays down the manner and qualification for appointment and terms and conditions of service of the teachers. The said Section 23 (1) of the Act 2009 prescribes that any person possessing such minimum qualification, as laid down by an “academic authority”, authorized by the Central Government by notification, shall be eligible for appointment as a Teacher. It is worth to mention at this stage that National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) has released a Regulation by superseding the N.C.T.E. Regulation, 2009 published on 28.11.2014 with a Regulation by appendix-1. As per the above Regu
The court established that qualifications recognized by the NCTE are sufficient for teacher appointments, regardless of specific nomenclature in state rules.
The court established that qualifications recognized by the NCTE must be considered valid for teacher appointments, regardless of specific state rules.
The court established that qualifications recognized by the N.C.T.E. are valid for eligibility, even if not explicitly mentioned in state rules.
B.Ed. qualification alone is not sufficient for appointment as a teacher in Elementary/Primary Schools, as established by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
The validity of the TET certificate, eligibility for selection, and subsequent changes in the selection process influenced the court's decision.
The judgment established the principle that B.Ed. (Special Education) qualification holders were eligible for participating in the UTET-I/CTET-I examination based on the NCTE notification dated 28.06....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.