IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Bhawana Devi and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 930 of 2022
Decided On : 08-04-2024
Education - Appointment Eligibility - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Section 23(1); Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012 - The court interpreted the qualifications for teacher appointments, emphasizing the recognition of D.Ed. as valid under NCTE regulations, influencing the decision to allow petitioners' eligibility.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners, holding a D.Ed. qualification, were denied appointment as Assistant Teachers in Uttarakhand despite meeting the qualifications set by the NCTE and participating in the selection process.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' qualifications were valid under the NCTE regulations and that their rejection was not justified as the D.Ed. qualification was not explicitly excluded in the relevant rules.
Issues: Whether the petitioners possessed the minimum qualifications for appointment as Assistant Teachers as per the applicable rules and regulations.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the NCTE's recognition of the D.Ed. qualification was sufficient for eligibility, and the absence of explicit exclusion in the rules meant the petitioners should be considered for appointment.
Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing the state to consider the petitioners for appointment as Assistant Teachers.
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Purohit, J.
Urgency Application Nos.04 of 2024, 04 of 2024 is allowed.
2. In the present writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of writ order in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Govt. Primary School pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Appointing Authority for making appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School on the basis of D.Ed. (Diploma in Education) obtained by the petitioners.
3. The facts in the nutshell are that the petitioners had passed their Secondary School Examination and Senior Secondary School Examination from National Institute of Open Schooling and thereafter, petitioner no.1 pursued B.A. (Bachlors of Arts) from University of Delhi; petitioner no.2 pursued B.A. (Bachlors of Arts) from Shri Dev Suman University Uttarakhand; petitioner no.3 petitioner has completed her graduation from University of Delhi and petitioner no.4 has completed her graduation from University of Delhi. The petitioner appeared and successfully completed the course of Diploma in Education (Two years Course) from Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.
4. According to the petitioners, in the year 2020, the posts of Assistant Teacher in Government Primary Schools of Uttarakhand were advertised for 10 districts in the State of Uttarakhand, pursuant to which, the petitioners applied.
5. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement, to fill up the post of Assistant Teacher through direct recruitment, a third waiting list for counseling of selected candidates was issued, in which the petitioner participated on 11.04.2022. After counseling, 13 candidates were issued the appointment letters, but, the petitioners were denied for the same.
6. On enquiry, it came to the notice of the petitioners that their candidature have been rejected on the ground that they possessed two years’ Diploma in Education (D.Ed.), however, the said qualification possessed by the petitioners, is not mentioned to be the minimum qualification for appointment in the Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012. The notification issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) dated 23.08.2010 prescribing minimum qualification for Elementary Teachers for Class I to V is quoted herein below :
7. It is not in dispute that the institute from where the present petitioners have pursued their 2-years Diploma Course in Education is recognized by the N.C.T.E. or not.
8. Section 23(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 lays down the manner and qualification for appointment and terms and conditions of service of the teachers. The said Section 23 (1) of the Act 2009 prescribes that any person possessing such minimum qualification, as laid down by an “academic authority”, authorized by the Central Government by notification, shall be eligible for appointment as a Teacher. It is worth to mention at this stage that National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) has released a Regulation by superseding the N.C.T.E. Regulation, 2009 published on 28.11.2014 with a Regulation by appendix-1. As per th
The court established that qualifications recognized by the NCTE must be considered valid for teacher appointments, regardless of specific state rules.
The court established that qualifications recognized by the NCTE are sufficient for teacher appointments, regardless of specific nomenclature in state rules.
The court established that qualifications recognized by the N.C.T.E. are valid for eligibility, even if not explicitly mentioned in state rules.
B.Ed. qualification alone is not sufficient for appointment as a teacher in Elementary/Primary Schools, as established by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court ruled that B.Ed. is not a valid qualification for primary school teachers, affecting eligibility for appointments made after its decision.
Possession of a higher qualification, such as B.Ed., did not disqualify the petitioner from holding the advertised post if she actually possessed the basic qualification laid down for the post.
The court determined that the insistence on having Hindi as a subject in graduation for teacher appointments violates constitutional rights as there was no NCTE mandate for such additional qualificat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.