SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 327

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Bhawana Devi and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 930 of 2022
Decided On : 08-04-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. with Mr. Bhupendra Singh Koranga, learned Brief Holder.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that qualifications recognized by the NCTE must be considered valid for teacher appointments, regardless of specific state rules.

Headnote:

Education - Appointment Eligibility - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Section 23(1); Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012 - The court interpreted the qualifications for teacher appointments, emphasizing the recognition of D.Ed. as valid under NCTE regulations, influencing the decision to allow petitioners' eligibility.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, holding a D.Ed. qualification, were denied appointment as Assistant Teachers in Uttarakhand despite meeting the qualifications set by the NCTE and participating in the selection process.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners' qualifications were valid under the NCTE regulations and that their rejection was not justified as the D.Ed. qualification was not explicitly excluded in the relevant rules.

Issues: Whether the petitioners possessed the minimum qualifications for appointment as Assistant Teachers as per the applicable rules and regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the NCTE's recognition of the D.Ed. qualification was sufficient for eligibility, and the absence of explicit exclusion in the rules meant the petitioners should be considered for appointment.

Result: The writ petition is allowed, directing the state to consider the petitioners for appointment as Assistant Teachers.

JUDGMENT :

Pankaj Purohit, J.

Urgency Application Nos.04 of 2024, 04 of 2024 is allowed.

2. In the present writ petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of writ order in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in Govt. Primary School pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Appointing Authority for making appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School on the basis of D.Ed. (Diploma in Education) obtained by the petitioners.

3. The facts in the nutshell are that the petitioners had passed their Secondary School Examination and Senior Secondary School Examination from National Institute of Open Schooling and thereafter, petitioner no.1 pursued B.A. (Bachlors of Arts) from University of Delhi; petitioner no.2 pursued B.A. (Bachlors of Arts) from Shri Dev Suman University Uttarakhand; petitioner no.3 petitioner has completed her graduation from University of Delhi and petitioner no.4 has completed her graduation from University of Delhi. The petitioner appeared and successfully completed the course of Diploma in Education (Two years Course) from Board of Secondary Education, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

4. According to the petitioners, in the year 2020, the posts of Assistant Teacher in Government Primary Schools of Uttarakhand were advertised for 10 districts in the State of Uttarakhand, pursuant to which, the petitioners applied.

5. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement, to fill up the post of Assistant Teacher through direct recruitment, a third waiting list for counseling of selected candidates was issued, in which the petitioner participated on 11.04.2022. After counseling, 13 candidates were issued the appointment letters, but, the petitioners were denied for the same.

6. On enquiry, it came to the notice of the petitioners that their candidature have been rejected on the ground that they possessed two years’ Diploma in Education (D.Ed.), however, the said qualification possessed by the petitioners, is not mentioned to be the minimum qualification for appointment in the Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teacher) Service Rules, 2012. The notification issued by the National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) dated 23.08.2010 prescribing minimum qualification for Elementary Teachers for Class I to V is quoted herein below :

    “(a) Senior Secondary (or equivalent) with atleast 50% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known). OR Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 45% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (by whatever name known) in accordance with the NCTE (recognition norms and procedure) Regulation, 2002. OR Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 50% marks and four years Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.Ed.). OR Senior Secondary (or its equivalent) with atleast 50% marks and two years Diploma in Elementary Education (Special Education). AND Pass in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) to be conducted by appropriate Government in accordance with the guidelines framed by NCTE for the purpose.”

7. It is not in dispute that the institute from where the present petitioners have pursued their 2-years Diploma Course in Education is recognized by the N.C.T.E. or not.

8. Section 23(1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 lays down the manner and qualification for appointment and terms and conditions of service of the teachers. The said Section 23 (1) of the Act 2009 prescribes that any person possessing such minimum qualification, as laid down by an “academic authority”, authorized by the Central Government by notification, shall be eligible for appointment as a Teacher. It is worth to mention at this stage that National Council for Teacher Education (N.C.T.E.) has released a Regulation by superseding the N.C.T.E. Regulation, 2009 published on 28.11.2014 with a Regulation by appendix-1. As per th

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top