IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Pankaj Purohit, J.
Pushkar Singh and Others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No.3130 of 2017
Decided On : 18-03-2024
MANDAMUS - EMPLOYMENT - The court held that once an educational institution is taken into the grant-in-aid list by the State Government, it is obligated to fulfill its commitments, including the absorption of teachers and payment of salaries, as per Section 50 of the Uttarakhand Education Act 2006. The court's decision was influenced by a precedent case, reinforcing the binding nature of the State's commitments upon granting aid.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, selected as Assistant Teachers, sought to be absorbed into the grant-in-aid system and to receive their salaries from the date the institution was taken under grant-in-aid by the State Government.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the matter was covered by a previous judgment which established that the State cannot backtrack on its commitments once an institution is included in the grant-in-aid list.
Issues: Whether the petitioners are entitled to be absorbed as Assistant Teachers and receive their salaries following the institution's inclusion in the grant-in-aid list.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 50 of the Uttarakhand Education Act 2006, which mandates that once an institution is granted aid, the State is bound to honor its commitments regarding employment and salary payments.
Result: The writ petition was allowed in accordance with the previous judgment, affirming the petitioners' rights to absorption and salary payments.
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Purohit, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the indulgence of this Court in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to absorb their services on the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) from the date the institute has been take on grant in aid and further commanding and directing the respondents to pay their salary from the date of taking the institution in grant in aid.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 participated in the selection process and were selected on the post of Assistant Teacher, (L.T. Grade), English and Physical Education respectively and the approval of the aforesaid selection was granted by the respondent No.3-Chief Education Officer, Nainital and accordingly, appointment letters were issued to the petitioner No.1 & 2 on 07.11.2015 and 09.11.2015 respectively. Similarly, an advertisement was published on 08.08.2003 in daily news paper Daily Jagran inviting applications for the post Assistant Teacher, (L.T. Grade), Hindi, in which, petitioner No.3 appeared and was selected by the Managing Committee and the appointment letter dated 30.08.2003 was issued. A Government Order was issued on 04.03.2014, taking 21 institutions under the grant-in-aid of the State Government including Hat Kalika Inter College Bindukhatta, Lalkuan District Nainital and consequently, one post of Principal and the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) were also sanctioned. On 01.02.2016, another Government Order was issued, in which the State Government has decided to provide the grant for the financial year 2015-16 and for certain schools, it was provided that the grant shall be sanctioned after the sanction of the post and the token grant was provided. On 23.12.2016, another Government Order was issued granting token grant of Rs.2,00,000/- to Hat Kalika Inter College Bindukhatta, Lalkuan, District Nainital. The institution is already under full grant but the salary has not been released by the State Government.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the similar controversy has come up for consideration before this Court in writ petition No.1820 of 2017 (M/S) and this Court has been pleased to hold that in view of the Section 50 of the Uttarakhand Education Act 2006, the moment the institute is taken into grant-in-aid list on the orders passed by Executive Head of the State Government, the State cannot back track on its commitments and its orders. The appeal filed against the orders passed in writ petition No.1820 of 2017 (M/S) has also been dismissed on merit on 06.08.2018 and since, no further appeal was filed, the judgment has attained the finality.
4. On the last date i.e.14.03.2024 learned State Counsel was directed to get instructions as to whether the matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court or not.
5. Today, learned State Counsel submits written instruction at Bar, the same is taken on record. According to the said written instruction, learned State Counsel submits that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1820 of 2017.
6. In such view of the matter, writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1820 of 2017.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
State liable for teachers' salaries from grant-in-aid date when posts created; token grants invalid; employees entitled to arrears despite delayed absorption and institute not litigating.
Eligible PTA college teachers entitled to grant-in-aid salary despite NET/SLET lack post-dispensation; discriminatory denial while granting others violates Articles 14,16; rules persist without repea....
(1) Payment of salary to teachers shall be made on the basis of seniority and subject of teaching has no relevance.(2) Review – Provision of review is not to scrutinize correctness of decision render....
PTA-appointed Assistant Professor from reserved category meeting relaxed 50% Master's marks and eligibility test criteria entitled to Grant-in-Aid salary from appointment date; denial despite parity ....
Grant-in-aid is not automatic and depends on various factors, and appointments must comply with relevant government orders and staff fixation rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.