Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
2. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
“i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the salary to the petitioner from the date of including the school S.R.D. Bahuguna Inter College, Sevelakala, Dehradun under the Grant-In-Aid i.e. 28.2.2014.
ii) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
iii) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.”
3. The facts narrated in the writ petition are as follows:
The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 03.07.2012 at the SRD Bahuguna Inter College, Sevelakala, Dehradun. The said institute is recognized by the Uttarakhand Education Board and was run by the Committee of Management. The Government of Uttarakhand took a decision to include the said institute into grant-in-aid and a notification dated 28.02.2014 was issued to the said effect.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the salary to the petitioner was not paid w.e.f. 28
PTA-appointed Assistant Professor from reserved category meeting relaxed 50% Master's marks and eligibility test criteria entitled to Grant-in-Aid salary from appointment date; denial despite parity ....
Employees appointed before the establishment of regulations under the Act 2000 are entitled to salary from the State Exchequer, as their appointments were valid under the Act.
(1) Payment of salary to teachers shall be made on the basis of seniority and subject of teaching has no relevance.(2) Review – Provision of review is not to scrutinize correctness of decision render....
The State Government's liability for salary payments to college staff as per Section 60-E of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, and the inability of government orders to override statutory rules.
The court reinforced that salaries must be paid to teachers based on regularized appointments, rejecting any arbitrary withholding by the State as per established constitutional rights, regardless of....
The discretionary nature of state policy decisions regarding pay revisions is upheld, with no obligation to adopt central schemes mandatorily.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of teachers in minority institutions to salary out of grant-in-aid, as clarified by the Bihar State University Act, 1976, and the j....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
