IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
Sanjay Singh Rana - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2 Of 2024 With Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3343 of 2023 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 244 of 2024
Decided On : 06-03-2024
Cooperative - Election Rights - Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004 - The court interpreted amendments to Rule 456(2) which restricted representation in cooperative elections to Chairmen only, thus denying the petitioner's claim to participate as a Delegate.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an election program, claiming a right to participate as a Delegate in the Central Milk Producers Cooperative Society elections, based on prior election as Delegate from a Primary Society.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that amendments to the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, specifically Rule 456(2), eliminated the right of Delegates to represent their societies, granting that right solely to Chairmen.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, elected as a Delegate, has the right to participate in the elections of the Central Milk Producers Cooperative Society after the amendment to the rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the statutory amendments clearly delineated representation rights, limiting them to Chairmen of Primary Milk Cooperative Societies, thus the petitioner had no vested right to participate as a Delegate.
Result: The writ petitions are dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) :
1. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and are being heard & decided together. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No. 2 of 2024 alone are being considered.
2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
(I) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the election program dated 20.12.2023 ANNEXURE NO. 2 issued by Respondent No. 5.
(II) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to issue a fresh election program for elections in the Central Milk Producing Cooperative Society i.e. Nainital Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd., Lalkuan, permitting the Petitioner to participate in the election as a delegate for the primary milk producing cooperative society, Durgapalpur II Motahaldu, Lalkuan.
Or in the alternative.
be pleased to direct the respondent to first conduct a fresh election for Chairman of the each Primary Cooperative Society and then to conduct the election of members of Managing Committee of the Nainital Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd., Lalkuan.
3. There is a Primary Milk Cooperative Society known as ‘Durgapalpur II Motahaldu, Lalkuan’. Petitioner claims to have been elected as delegate of the said society. The expression ‘Delegate of Society’ has been defined in Rule 2(v) of Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004, which is extracted below:
“(v) “Delegate of Society” means an individual appointed in accordance with these rules by members of Committee of Management of a Co-operative Society to represent it in the general body of another Co-operative Society to which such Society is a member;”
4. Petitioner has challenged Office Memo dated 20.12.2023 issued by Secretary, Cooperative Election Authority, Uttarakhand, whereby programme for conducting election to Central Milk Producers Cooperative Society was notified.
5. A Delegate is elected in terms of provision contained in Rule 456 of the aforesaid Rules. State Government amended the aforesaid Rules by Amendment Rules notified on 29.07.2021 (annexed as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition). Sub-rule (2) to Rule 456 was also amended by the said amendment. Relevant extract of the amendment Rules 2021, is reproduced below:
| Amendment of 16 rule 456 | In existing rule 456 of the principal rules- (i) for existing sub rule(2) as set out in column 1 below, the rule as set out in column 2 shall be substituted, namely:- | |
|
| Column-1 Existing rule | Column-2 Rule as hereby Substituted |
|
| Election: The Election Officer shall along with the notice and programme of election of members of the committee of Management also intimate that date, programme of election of chairman, vice chairman or delegates and also specify the place where such election shall be held. | Election: The Election Officer shall along with the notice and program of election of members of the committee of Management also intimate that date program of election of Chairman or representative and also specify the place where such election shall be held: Provided that where any General Body of Milk Producer’s Co-operative society is represented by the other Milk Producer Co-operative Society, concerned society shall be represented only through its Chairman. |
6. Before its amendment, Rule 456(2) provided simultaneously holding of election of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Delegates with the election of members of Committee of Management. The expression ‘Delegates’ is now replaced by the expression ‘Representative’ in Rule 456(2) and a proviso is added providing that, instead of Delegate, a Milk Producer’s Co-operative Society shall be represented in other Milk Producer’s Cooperative Society only through its Chairman. Thus the right available to Delegate, before amendment, is conferred upon the Chairman.
7. Petitioner co
AI
The amendment to Rule 456(2) of the Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004, restricts representation in cooperative elections to Chairmen, nullifying the rights of Delegates.
The court held that electoral participation must be facilitated within legal timelines, ensuring those eligible to vote are included in electoral processes, reflecting a commitment to democratic prin....
A delegate under different cooperative statutes can hold multiple voting rights without infringing the two-vote limit established by Section 21 of the Karnataka State Cooperative Societies Act, 1959.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of the petitioner's fundamental right to participate in the election process due to the inconsistency between Bye-law 24(viii) and Se....
The suspension of election should only occur under specific circumstances as provided in the rules, and the appointment of an alternative body and election officer may be necessary to ensure a free a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Section 28(8) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act only pertains to the right to attend general body meetings and be elected as a member of....
The bye-laws governing elections within co-operative societies are valid and enforceable, as they regulate participation without infringing on voting rights, thereby promoting effective governance wh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.