IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANU SIVARAMAN, C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JJ.
The Administrative Committee – Appellant
Versus
Gopalakrishna Pillai, S/o Thankappan Pillai – Respondent
W.A.Nos.928, 982, 1186, 1187, 1189, 1192, 1198, 1201, 1204 and 1255 of 2023
Decided on : 18-12-2023
Kerala Cooperative Societies Act - Section 28(8), Section 8A(4), Section 20, Section 21, Rule 44A - Election- The court interpreted Section 28(8) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, holding that it only pertains to the right to attend general body meetings and be elected as a member of the committee of the Regional Cooperative Milk Producers Union. The provision does not restrict the voting rights of member societies governed by administrators. The court reversed the findings of the learned single Judge on issues B and C, directing that the votes cast by the delegates of the member societies administered by administrators or administrative committees are liable to be counted and the results declared accordingly.
Fact of the Case:
The appeals arose from a common judgment in a batch of 10 writ petitions related to the election to the Managing Committee of the Thiruvananthapuram Regional Milk Producers Union, a central society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act and Rules. The preliminary voters’ list included societies under the administration of an administrator/administrative committee and member societies admitted by the Administrator/Administrative Committee. The final voters’ list was challenged in the writ petitions.
Finding of the Court:
The court reversed the findings of the learned single Judge on issues B and C, holding that Section 28(8) of the Act only pertains to the right to attend general body meetings and be elected as a member of the committee of the Regional Cooperative Milk Producers Union. The provision does not restrict the voting rights of member societies governed by administrators. The court directed that the votes cast by the delegates of the member societies administered by administrators or administrative committees are liable to be counted and the results declared accordingly.
Issues: The court addressed the issues of challenging the election process in a writ petition, the interpretation of Section 28(8) of the Act, the effect of Sections 20, 21, and Rule 44A on the interpretation of Section 28(8), and the applicability of sub-sections (1), (2), and (3) of Section 8A to APCOS.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 28(8) of the Act, which was found to only pertain to the right to attend general body meetings and be elected as a member of the committee of the Regional Cooperative Milk Producers Union. The provision does not restrict the voting rights of member societies governed by administrators.
Final Decision: The court directed that the votes cast by the delegates of the member societies administered by administrators or administrative committees are liable to be counted and the results declared accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
Anu Sivaraman, J.
1. These appeals arise from a common judgment dated 15.6.2023 of a learned single Judge in a batch of 10 writ petitions arising in connection with the election to the Managing Committee of the Thiruvananthapuram Regional Milk Producers Union, which is a central society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act and Rules. An earlier common judgment allowing W.P.(C).Nos.1673 & 1679 of 2023 dated 10.04.2023 is also under challenge.
2. The election to the Managing Committee of the Thiruvananthapuram Regional Milk Producers Union, a Central society, was notified to be held on 09.04.2022. The preliminary voters’ list was published on 05.03.2022. Objections were to be submitted on or before 11.03.2022 and to be considered on 14.03.2022. It is contended that out of the 978 societies included in the preliminary voters’ list, 58 societies were under the administration of an administrator/administrative committee and 23 member societies were admitted/affiliated by the Administrator/Administrative Committee. The petitioners contended that the 58 member societies which were under the administration of an Administrator/Administrative Committee were ineligible to sent their members to participate in the election. It was further contended that 23 member societies, who were included as members by the Administrator/Administrative Committee were also not entitled to vote. The contention was on the basis of Section 28(8) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, which reads as follows:-
3. Reliance was also placed on the decision of the Apex Court in Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A. Kuttappan [2000 (2) KLT 480 (SC)] to contend that member societies admitted while the administrative committee was in power are not eligible to vote. The final voters’ list was published on 16.03.2022 including 58 member societies under the Administrator/Administrative Committees. 11 APCOS, which were found to have “deemed affiliation” under Section 8A(4) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act were found entitled to be included while 12 of the APCOS which were given affiliation by the administrative committee within 60 days from the date of election were deleted from the list. The final list contained 966 voters. This voters’ list was under challenge in the writ petitions.
4. On 23.03.2022, an interim order was passed directing that the votes cast by delegates of societies under the control of the administrators shall be kept in a separate box and counted separately. The declaration of result was also permitted. The matter was taken in appeal and by order dated 08.04.2022 in W.A.No.413/2022, stayed the declaration of results and directed that the results would be declared only after obtaining orders from this Court. The writ appeal was later disposed of by judgment dated 02.06.2022 requiring the parties to move for an early hearing of the writ petition. Thereafter, the pending writ petitions were heard on merits and the common judgment dated 15.6.2023 was rendered which is under challenge herein.
5. In the meanwhile, W.P.(C).Nos.1673 of 2023 and 1679 of 2023 were filed by candidates who had contested the elections and by judgment dated 10.4.2023, the returning officer was directed to declare the petitioner in W.P.(C).No.1673 of 2023 elected to the Managing Committee of the Union. The said common judgment is also under challenge.
6. The learned single Judge had framed four issues to be
Ahammedkutyy v. Ali 2003 (3) KLT 739
Abdurahiman. P. and others v. State of Kerala and others ILR 2020 (1) Ker. 176
Atam Prakash v. State of Haryana and others (1986) 2 SCC 249
Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh and others v. L.V.A. Dixitulu and others (1979) 2 SCC 34
Dwarka Prasad v. Dwarka Das Saraf AIR 1975 SC 1758
Geeta v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2010) 13 SCC 678
Ismail P.M. v. Muhammad Ameer-Ul-Islam and another 2022 2 ILR(Ker) 666
Jt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A. Kuttappan 2000 (2) KLT 480 (SC)
Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A. Kuttappan 2000 (2) KLT 480 (SC)
Pundlik v. State of Maharashtra and others (2005) 7 SCC 181
PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited v. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited (2021) 7 SCC 1
R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka and another (1992) 1 SCC 335
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Section 28(8) of the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act only pertains to the right to attend general body meetings and be elected as a member of....
Section 16B of KCS Act creates an ineligibility for a member of an APCOS to continue as an active member in certain circumstances, which are totally unique to such a type of society.
The right to contest elections is a statutory right, not a fundamental right, and arbitrary term restrictions violate the autonomy of co-operative societies.
When a right is created by a statute, which itself prescribes the remedy or procedure for enforcing the right or liability, resort must be had to that particular statutory remedy before invoking the ....
The bye-laws governing elections within co-operative societies are valid and enforceable, as they regulate participation without infringing on voting rights, thereby promoting effective governance wh....
Sub-rules (4) and (4A) would specifically make it clear that what was being sought to be explained by explanation was with regard to right to be included in a voters list and therefore, eligibility t....
The amendment allowing nomination of women to co-operative committees is constitutional, reinforcing women's participation while affirming that election is not the exclusive method for committee form....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of the petitioner's fundamental right to participate in the election process due to the inconsistency between Bye-law 24(viii) and Se....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.