Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
Parmendra Singh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
First Bail Application No. 1085 of 2023
Decided On : 29-02-2024
BAIL - PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT - The court analyzed the applicant's role as a public servant who misappropriated a significant amount of money, emphasizing the severity of the charges under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court highlighted the applicant's admission of misappropriation and the involvement of multiple parties, concluding that these factors did not warrant bail.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant, Parmendra Singh Rawat, was in judicial custody for misappropriating Rs. 31,75,096 from security deposits owed to contractors while working in a public works department. He transferred these funds to accounts of relatives and associates.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had admitted to misappropriating funds and had already deposited a portion of the misappropriated amount. However, the court noted the serious nature of the charges and the evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
Issues: Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the serious charges of misappropriation and the evidence against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the severity of the charges under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act, along with the applicant's admission of wrongdoing, justified the denial of bail.
Result: The bail application was rejected.
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
1. Applicant Parmendra Singh Rawat is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 9 of 2022, under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station Lansdown, District Pauri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. According to the FIR, the applicant was working in a public works department. Amongst others, his duty was to return the 10 per cent of the security deposits to the contractors. But, in an enquiry, it was found that the applicant did not return the 10 per cent of the security deposits of 19 contractors and transferred that amount in the account of his brother, friends, wife, drivers, etc, and total Rs. 31,75,096/- were misappropriated.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has already deposited Rs. 25,13,296/-; PW1 has already been examined at trial and in his cross-examination, he has admitted that many more persons may be involved in it.
5. Learned State Counsel would submit that the witnesses have supported the prosecution; PW1 has also stated about it; it is admitted case; the applicant himself has deposited more than Rs. 25 Lakhs.
6. Being a public servant, the applicant has misappropriated huge amount and, as per chargesheet, it was deposited in the account of his brother Ravindra Singh, his wife Anupma, friends, drivers, etc, thereby he misappropriated Rs. 31,75,096/-. In fact, the applicant has admitted it.
7. Having considered, this Court does not see any reason, which may entitle the applicant to bail. Accordingly, the bail application deserves to be rejected.
8. The bail application is rejected.
AI
Public servants accused of misappropriation of funds face stringent scrutiny under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and admissions of wrongdoing significantly impact bail considerations.
The court considered the extent of the petitioner's involvement and the completed investigation as key factors in granting bail for the offence of misappropriation of funds.
The economic offence of having deep routed conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds, needs to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economic of the country, a....
Public servants are held to higher standards of trust; misappropriation of funds invokes strict legal consequences under Section 409 IPC, emphasizing accountability and integrity.
Bail granted based on custody duration and lack of prior criminal record.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
