Dilsher Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 517

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Dilsher Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Lalit Sharma.
For the State :Mr. V.K. Gemini, Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Brief Holder.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Present Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail under Sections 420, 465, 466, 468, 471, 474, 120 B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 8 and Section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in connection with the First Information Report No.32 of 2017 (Special Sessions Trial No.4 of 2020), registered at police station Pant Nagar, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. V.K. Gemini, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Brief Holder for State.

3. Learned counsel for State has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application orally.

4. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, contended that the applicant, aged about 55 years, has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He was not arrested during the course of the investigation. He is not a previous convict. He is a permanent resident of District, Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant.

5. Mr. V.K. Gemini, learned D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document